Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marshall 1987x 5881 model output transformer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marshall 1987x 5881 model output transformer

    I have this Marshall 1987x head for repair. It is the 5881 model.
    Someone removed the output transformer and I have no idea as to the specs of the original transformer.
    Anyone have an idea what the transformer part number is and the specs??
    Thank you!!!

  • #2
    The part number is C3070.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2020-12-29 at 16.01.30.png
Views:	388
Size:	77.3 KB
ID:	921223
    Support for Fender, Laney, Marshall, Mesa, VOX and many more. https://jonsnell.co.uk
    If you can't fix it, I probably can.

    Comment


    • #3
      II think the C3070 is the 100 watt OT of the JCM900 and 2000 series.
      The 1987 reissue must be D2507 (also Dagnall).

      Comment


      • #4
        No reason you can't replace it with one for EL34's.

        Comment


        • #5
          In principle the "tech spec" to find it is simply "Marshall 50W OT"
          Youīll find a few original ones if itīs important and many "second source" ones, most of them very good.

          Itīs such a standard generic product that searching for it that way will be faster than mentioning impedance or other parameters, go figure.
          Juan Manuel Fahey

          Comment


          • #6
            https://www.ebay.com/itm/MARSHALL-OU...sAAOSw7Hhcp3HW

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by drewl View Post
              No reason you can't replace it with one for EL34's.
              That is one for EL34s. They use the same one for 5881 version. All the marshalls I know of that have an EL34 as well as 5881 version, they always use the same OT.
              But I think your point is that any generic marshall OT for 50W will work there, and I agree.
              Originally posted by Enzo
              I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


              Comment

              Working...
              X