Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vt40 bias problem, redplating output tubes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    C18 and C19 are a stacked arrangement. Whichever one has the 603V at it's (+) end should have about 300V at it's (-) end.
    Originally posted by Enzo
    I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


    Comment


    • #17
      I meant that C15 should be a 600V cap, making it rather big at 1µ.
      - Own Opinions Only -

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post
        I meant that C15 should be a 600V cap, making it rather big at 1µ.
        It's supposed to be .047, he replaced with 0.1uF. Will probably shift the bias voltage a bit more negative than with the .047
        Originally posted by Enzo
        I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by g1 View Post

          It's supposed to be .047, he replaced with 0.1uF. Will probably shift the bias voltage a bit more negative than with the .047
          You're right. As so often I missed the decimal point before the number. What a bad habit to omit the zero before the decimal point.
          No one would do this over here, so it's not something I am used to.

          But my main point was that this voltage dropper cap needs to be sufficiently rated as it sees large peaks voltage.
          Additionally there are high mains transients every now and then, that's why X-rated caps are tested at 2kV or so.
          Last edited by Helmholtz; 10-15-2022, 07:00 PM.
          - Own Opinions Only -

          Comment

          Working...
          X