Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Traynor YBA-1 Master Volume

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Greg Robinson View Post
    .. - the 2.2Meg "safety" resistors which are the entire rationale of the Lar Mar design is too high a value to prevent thermal/grid current runaway if the wiper loses contact,...
    Agree. I typically use a higher pot value and a lower safety resistor value. Say you have 220k bias feed resistors. I would use a dual 500k pot and parallel 470k resistors.
    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by g1 View Post
      Hi Lorne. The schematic on pg.7 or 8 of the attached package should be good (the last one on pg.9 already had 3-prong).
      Do you mean the 'trainwreck type 3' master from the Robinette site? That is a cross-line type that just cancels out the out-of-phase signals at the power tube grids.

      Actually, I think it's page 6 (marked '3' because the font for the tubes matches. See pic in post #11.

      Thanks to all for your suggestions - I have gone the simple route with just a ! meg pot on the pin 5's, seems to work fine. The LarMar may well be superior but I would have needed someone holding my hand to trace the circuit. Although I have a nice soldering iron, meter, signal generator & Oscope - I'm a little short on theory... without this forum I'm lost. So I'll make another donation now.

      We will see what the owner thinks.

      Thanks again,
      Lorne
      I'm not old - I'm vintage

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by mtlbasslad View Post


        Actually, I think it's page 6 (marked '3' because the font for the tubes matches. See pic in post #11.
        The pg.6 has a choke instead of a 470R10W resistor, and a 1K10W feeding the power tube screens (instead of another 470R10W).
        In yours I did not see a choke, but see two 470R10W, so I ruled out pg.6

        Originally posted by Enzo
        I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by g1 View Post
          The pg.6 has a choke instead of a 470R10W resistor, and a 1K10W feeding the power tube screens (instead of another 470R10W).
          In yours I did not see a choke, but see two 470R10W, so I ruled out pg.6
          It gets stranger & stranger with the schematics - I didn't find a choke either ? But mine has a fuse not a circuit breaker... so?
          I'm not old - I'm vintage

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by mtlbasslad View Post

            It gets stranger & stranger with the schematics - I didn't find a choke either ? But mine has a fuse not a circuit breaker... so?
            Then I would say pg.7 of the pdf package is it. Maybe even with the errors uncorrected by the handwritten changes.
            The font matches the one in your photo, and the circuit best matches what you have there.
            Originally posted by Enzo
            I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


            Comment


            • #21
              I finally got the review from the owner - he is thrilled.
              I'm not old - I'm vintage

              Comment

              Working...
              X