Bob,
Thanks (again!) for the info! I had a few questions:
1) Does the stage the Zener is being used on have a cathode bypass cap, and if so, what are the Rk/Ck values (if you don't mind sharing them) ? This question relates to the treble loss mentioned above; if you had (for example) a 1uF Ck across a 1.8K Rk, the Zener would have a different effect on the mid/treble frequencies than on LF.
2) I think the reason the Zener only really does anything on the final OD stage is that the previous stages all have pretty heavy attenuation, either via tone stack or resistive voltage divider. I'm going by the '97 Rev. 1.2 schematic I have, which has 1M 'Volume', 100K 'OD Trim', and 250K 'Drive' pots. If the existing circuit is designed to minimize the effects of grid blocking, it stands to reason that any grid-blocking 'fix' will have little or nothing to work with (just thinking out loud).
Ray
Thanks (again!) for the info! I had a few questions:
1) Does the stage the Zener is being used on have a cathode bypass cap, and if so, what are the Rk/Ck values (if you don't mind sharing them) ? This question relates to the treble loss mentioned above; if you had (for example) a 1uF Ck across a 1.8K Rk, the Zener would have a different effect on the mid/treble frequencies than on LF.
2) I think the reason the Zener only really does anything on the final OD stage is that the previous stages all have pretty heavy attenuation, either via tone stack or resistive voltage divider. I'm going by the '97 Rev. 1.2 schematic I have, which has 1M 'Volume', 100K 'OD Trim', and 250K 'Drive' pots. If the existing circuit is designed to minimize the effects of grid blocking, it stands to reason that any grid-blocking 'fix' will have little or nothing to work with (just thinking out loud).
Ray
Comment