Hello!
this is my first time posting.
I am a beginner when it comes to amps and only done a few minor jobs
(added a bias control to a carvin x 100b, replaced screen grid resistors, and biased tubes)
but i can solder well
I just acquired a sovtek mig 100. not the 100h but the 100.
.
I really like the amp , i think it is going to work great for me
I use the low input and get a good clean tone and use an opamp big muff for my dirty tone and it sounds great,
HOWEVER...
I would like to coax some more bass out of it .
I have the bass on 10 and have the treble on maybe 4
It seems very bright.
after some searching i have found some talk of the differences of the 100 vs 100h
the 100 h sounds like it has more bass and more gain.
i dont need more gain but i would like more bass.
a member here vintagekiki posted some info on the differences..( thank you vintagekiki)
here is a link to the discussion i found this info and also schematic links
https://music-electronics-forum.com/...equest?t=44493
http://music-electronics-forum.com/t40194/#post394505
here is what he posted as differences
Sovtek Mig 100(H) vs Sovtek Mig 100U
(The "u" he is referencing has the same values as my "100" in regard to these differences)
Basically amps Sovtek Mig 100(H) and Sovtek Mig 100U by schematics are relatively similar.
The differences are as follows.
Tube V1.2 (Pre amp)
Mig 100 (H) Rk = 4.7k (more drive)
Mig 100U Rk = 1k (more clean)
Tube V2.2 (Tone control)
Mig 100(H) tone control from anode (more drive)
Mig 100U tone control from cathode follower (less drive)
Schematic tone control equalization
Mig 100(H) associates to Fender amp.
Mig 100(H) middle control 10k (less middle regulation)
Mig 100U associates to Marshall amp.
Mig 100U middle control 25k
Mig 100U between treble and bass controls resistor 82k (when all pots at minimum bass is noticeable)
Tube V3 (Phase splitter)
Mig 100(H) Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)
Mig 100(H) Cg1 V3.1 = .01uF
Mig 100U Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .022uF (less bass)
Mig 100U Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF
Power supply
Mig 100(H) all elco = 220uF (hard)
Mig 100U all elco = 100uF (soft)
It looks like the "bass control"
and the" phase splitter" is where i can do a couple changes to get more bass
however i have a couple questions.
"Mig 100U between treble and bass controls resistor 82k (when all pots at minimum bass is noticeable"
Can i just lift one leg of this resistor to see if i like the change?
and also..
"Tube V3 (Phase splitter)
Mig 100(H) Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)
Mig 100(H) Cg1 V3.1 = .01uF
Mig 100U Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .022uF (less bass)
Mig 100U Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF"
should i change all 3 of the .022 caps?
or just the 2 "Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)"
and leave the ( Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF) alone rather than changing to it .01 uf.
I hope this all makes sense as far as what i am trying to accomplish.
again thanks to vintagekiki
i would appreciate any help
thank you
this is my first time posting.
I am a beginner when it comes to amps and only done a few minor jobs
(added a bias control to a carvin x 100b, replaced screen grid resistors, and biased tubes)
but i can solder well
I just acquired a sovtek mig 100. not the 100h but the 100.
.
I really like the amp , i think it is going to work great for me
I use the low input and get a good clean tone and use an opamp big muff for my dirty tone and it sounds great,
HOWEVER...
I would like to coax some more bass out of it .
I have the bass on 10 and have the treble on maybe 4
It seems very bright.
after some searching i have found some talk of the differences of the 100 vs 100h
the 100 h sounds like it has more bass and more gain.
i dont need more gain but i would like more bass.
a member here vintagekiki posted some info on the differences..( thank you vintagekiki)
here is a link to the discussion i found this info and also schematic links
https://music-electronics-forum.com/...equest?t=44493
http://music-electronics-forum.com/t40194/#post394505
here is what he posted as differences
Sovtek Mig 100(H) vs Sovtek Mig 100U
(The "u" he is referencing has the same values as my "100" in regard to these differences)
Basically amps Sovtek Mig 100(H) and Sovtek Mig 100U by schematics are relatively similar.
The differences are as follows.
Tube V1.2 (Pre amp)
Mig 100 (H) Rk = 4.7k (more drive)
Mig 100U Rk = 1k (more clean)
Tube V2.2 (Tone control)
Mig 100(H) tone control from anode (more drive)
Mig 100U tone control from cathode follower (less drive)
Schematic tone control equalization
Mig 100(H) associates to Fender amp.
Mig 100(H) middle control 10k (less middle regulation)
Mig 100U associates to Marshall amp.
Mig 100U middle control 25k
Mig 100U between treble and bass controls resistor 82k (when all pots at minimum bass is noticeable)
Tube V3 (Phase splitter)
Mig 100(H) Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)
Mig 100(H) Cg1 V3.1 = .01uF
Mig 100U Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .022uF (less bass)
Mig 100U Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF
Power supply
Mig 100(H) all elco = 220uF (hard)
Mig 100U all elco = 100uF (soft)
It looks like the "bass control"
and the" phase splitter" is where i can do a couple changes to get more bass
however i have a couple questions.
"Mig 100U between treble and bass controls resistor 82k (when all pots at minimum bass is noticeable"
Can i just lift one leg of this resistor to see if i like the change?
and also..
"Tube V3 (Phase splitter)
Mig 100(H) Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)
Mig 100(H) Cg1 V3.1 = .01uF
Mig 100U Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .022uF (less bass)
Mig 100U Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF"
should i change all 3 of the .022 caps?
or just the 2 "Ca V3.1/ V3.2 = .1uF (more bass)"
and leave the ( Cg1 V3.1 = .022uF) alone rather than changing to it .01 uf.
I hope this all makes sense as far as what i am trying to accomplish.
again thanks to vintagekiki
i would appreciate any help
thank you
Comment