Building a 6G3. I don't need a two channel amp, it's a waste of a triode in my book. I never use the second channel on my 5E3. Never. So I am going to build a one channel 6G3. Here is what I have come up with for the extra triode:
1) run the two stages in parallel for a "fatter" sound (dunno what exactly that means, but I read it here on m-e-f!). I cannot figure out what that would do to the signal. It wouldn't double the voltage. Would it double the current? Some weird flanging thing? Whatever it does, what effect would that have on the sound?
2) keep them separate and use one at a time (via a switch on the cathode->ground connection), each triode tuned differently. This seems pretty straightforward to me. Heck, I could even switch em both on if I did that.
3) what I am leaning towards, having a HI and LO input. One just hits a stock input stage (25uF cap, 820 resistor for one cathode, since stock is 1500 for both.) The other hits a hot input stage (2.2k resistor, 4.7uF bypass cap) and then the stock input stage. Think THD Uni-Valve, if you've ever seen or played one.
I realize this is a bit subjective, and I am not asking which I would prefer. What I am interested in is this: what exactly does scenario 1 do? Does scenario 3 seem practical (or will I create too much gain which will mess something up later down the line?)
Also, if you have ever done something similar to one of these circuits, what were your thoughts about it?
1) run the two stages in parallel for a "fatter" sound (dunno what exactly that means, but I read it here on m-e-f!). I cannot figure out what that would do to the signal. It wouldn't double the voltage. Would it double the current? Some weird flanging thing? Whatever it does, what effect would that have on the sound?
2) keep them separate and use one at a time (via a switch on the cathode->ground connection), each triode tuned differently. This seems pretty straightforward to me. Heck, I could even switch em both on if I did that.
3) what I am leaning towards, having a HI and LO input. One just hits a stock input stage (25uF cap, 820 resistor for one cathode, since stock is 1500 for both.) The other hits a hot input stage (2.2k resistor, 4.7uF bypass cap) and then the stock input stage. Think THD Uni-Valve, if you've ever seen or played one.
I realize this is a bit subjective, and I am not asking which I would prefer. What I am interested in is this: what exactly does scenario 1 do? Does scenario 3 seem practical (or will I create too much gain which will mess something up later down the line?)
Also, if you have ever done something similar to one of these circuits, what were your thoughts about it?
Comment