Apologies in advance for the 101 questions but quick search didn't turn up quite the answers I was looking for.
I'm switching out the two-prong cord in a friend’s Silvertone. It has the switch on one side of the primary and the fuse on the other. This seems to be fairly common in old amps (perhaps mostly in ones that originally used two-prong cords?).
The current standard of the hot going to the fuse first, then the switch, then the PT and the neutral going straight to the PT makes sense in that the fuse protects everything it can from the mains voltage....but... I always think "what if somebody who didn't know any better stuck a fuse directly in the socket without using the cap/holder, while the amp was still plugged in?" To me, this seems like the greater risk. This doesn’t appear to be the consensus. Why?
Assuming the current standard is truly the right way to do it, should old amps be converted to this setup when the cords are swapped out?
I'm switching out the two-prong cord in a friend’s Silvertone. It has the switch on one side of the primary and the fuse on the other. This seems to be fairly common in old amps (perhaps mostly in ones that originally used two-prong cords?).
The current standard of the hot going to the fuse first, then the switch, then the PT and the neutral going straight to the PT makes sense in that the fuse protects everything it can from the mains voltage....but... I always think "what if somebody who didn't know any better stuck a fuse directly in the socket without using the cap/holder, while the amp was still plugged in?" To me, this seems like the greater risk. This doesn’t appear to be the consensus. Why?
Assuming the current standard is truly the right way to do it, should old amps be converted to this setup when the cords are swapped out?
Comment