My understanding was that the role of the engineer was to implement a solution to reach the desired result, generally by using previoulsy proven solutions to similar situations.
And it's the scientist's role to find out why a particular implementation works.
When that is known, engineers can then use this knowledge to inform as to why one solution might be preferable to another etc.
Obviously there's a lot of crossover, but still a basic distinction.
Therefore Enzo and MWJB have engineering solutions to the OPs problem, and Merlin, Steve et al are taking a scientist's perspective by wanting to know how/why MWJB's proposal works.
I feel that Enzo's solution has the best chance to solving the OPs problem, but if we could get something quantifiable on the pre-amp voltage / brightness thing, it would be a big step forward. Peter.
And it's the scientist's role to find out why a particular implementation works.
When that is known, engineers can then use this knowledge to inform as to why one solution might be preferable to another etc.
Obviously there's a lot of crossover, but still a basic distinction.
Therefore Enzo and MWJB have engineering solutions to the OPs problem, and Merlin, Steve et al are taking a scientist's perspective by wanting to know how/why MWJB's proposal works.
I feel that Enzo's solution has the best chance to solving the OPs problem, but if we could get something quantifiable on the pre-amp voltage / brightness thing, it would be a big step forward. Peter.
Comment