Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

more volume = less bass??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by jrfrond View Post
    Simply driving the amp to OT saturation and achieving power compression narrows the power-bandwidth, making the highs and lows seem less apparent. This is NOT a bad thing
    No, not at all. It's an important part of the specific tone of certain classics. I just prefere not to include this highly variable and subjective approach in my designs. I think most of the time that it turns out to be a good thing, it's more of a happy accident. There have certainly been plenty of amps built with under sized OT's that have a bad rep for both tone and reliability. I don't have enough experience with the nature of transformer design to get predictable results this way. Also, there are other ways to control hi and low without using the OT as a post power tube EQ. As noted, this could even be a reliability issue. That is, unless you know transformers well enough to spec a design with an underrated stack that will saturate without having the rest of the OT in danger. It seems to me though that this practice would make for a less efficient OT. And I prefere my designs be efficient. It seems to add touch sensitivity.

    Originally posted by jrfrond View Post
    , and like Steve said, is actually a GOOD thing.
    Actually, he said he prefers NOT to design with intentionally under rated OT's. But he did recognize a phenomenon that could make it useful.

    Originally posted by jrfrond View Post
    I have actually designed and built amps with ganged volume pots that decrease bass response as you approach "10".
    I've done this too. It's very effective. But it contradicts pointing out that the OT can be used to roll off bass as the wave becomes square and saturation occurs. I do it because I DON'T design with small OT's.

    Originally posted by jrfrond View Post
    If it were a high-fidelity amp, you'd have lots of iron in the OT to minimize the chances of saturation and a multiple-stage PI/driver to deliver clean drive to the power tubes. It's a different animal, whereas reduction of power-bandwidth is a no-no. In overdriven guitar amps, you actually want and need this.
    True, true. I have built amps with over sized OT's as in Steve's example above. Sometimes the results were less than satisfying. But if you don't go overboard the amp can come to life and sound like it can breathe. It's just a matter of personal design experiences and goals of course.

    Chuck
    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

    Comment


    • #17
      if you want to soften things up a bit couldn't you just drop the value of filter caps or B+ to find a good balance of fullness and mush?

      Comment


      • #18
        ...the human ear does not "hear" different frequencies equally nor linearly, but rather responds to highes faster than to lows.

        ... Look up Fletcher-Munson curves.
        ...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat!"

        Comment

        Working...
        X