With the resurgence in interest in pentodes as input tubes, why aren't people using these? Seems like you could get similar results as an EF86, and you have the bonus of the triode to use as a CF, to fix the high output impedance.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
6AN8A or 7199 as input tube?
Collapse
X
-
My thought is to use a mosfet follower after a pentode. The large signal swing with the cathode/heater voltage thing bothers me. With the mosfet follower I don't have to worry. With a low enough impedance and large current drive I'm hoping to get a 10K volume pot out of the deal. Might solve some of that low volume crappy sound. Just something I want to try, anyway.
-
Originally posted by AdmiralB View PostWith the resurgence in interest in pentodes as input tubes, why aren't people using these? .Last edited by Amp Kat; 06-21-2007, 07:20 PM.KB
Comment
-
I'm planning to use a 6AN8A for my next build. Pentode input stage into cathode follower into a Marshall tone stack.
I'm not sure what size plate load would be appropriate. The Sunn schematic, where this tube is used as driver/PI, shows 270k. Looking at the data sheet I would think that better linearity would be achieved using a much heavier plate load. I am considering 25k for this application. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
DG
Comment
-
While the sovwrek tube may be discontinued there are scads of triode/pentodes that were designed for TV service that work extremely well for audio - and their available for just pennies from AES and other sources. The 6BR8 works very well and if you just want the pentode w/o the triode the 5879 was specificially designed for input and is a very quiet valve - I've built several amps with it (a bit more pricey than the TV tubes but still reasonable).
Rob
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rob Mercure View PostWhile the sovwrek tube may be discontinued there are scads of triode/pentodes that were designed for TV service that work extremely well for audio - and their available for just pennies from AES and other sources. The 6BR8 works very well and if you just want the pentode w/o the triode the 5879 was specificially designed for input and is a very quiet valve - I've built several amps with it (a bit more pricey than the TV tubes but still reasonable).
Rob
Comment
-
Like Bruce sez, lotsa designs to copy - RCA receiving tube manuals had them for years in the mid-late 1960s right up until they stopped publishing the manuals. Noise is energy in the system being dissipated in a manner that you probably don't want - and it can often be expressed as a percentage of signal level or energy used, etc. While sometimes the proportion varies with overall system energy usually it remains a somewhat stable fraction so if you can lower the overall system energy you can often lower the perception of noise.
Audio signal pentodes seem to run "quite quiet" at low Ep and Eg2 voltages - one of my favorite circuits using the 6BR8 runs the thang with about 45 VDC on each of these electrodes! While you lose gain pentodes have gain "to throw away" and you wind up with a really quiet amp. If I remember correctly Tektronics used the 5879 in one of the "3000" series 'scope's plug in vertical modules in the late 1950s/early 1960s and the schemo used to be available on the net. While this isn't an "audio" application it does provide some examples of very low voltage, very low noise, very high bandwidth use of pentodes. It also seems that I remember most input pentodes from that era being mounted in some sort of grommet or rubber block or other physical isolation shock assembly - could be as simple as isolating the tube socket mounting "ears" from the chassis with washers. Either that or you could cast them within a block of concrete but that may make replacement a tad difficult (yeah, I'm kidding but if you ran a 5879 at reduced heater dissipation and really low B+ you might have the encased tube outlast you!).
Rob
Comment
Comment