Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT Plate Load

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Steve Conner View Post
    Well, you're talking about "the metal guys"... Sure you're not a closet mosher yourself? \m/

    I am, when learning to play guitar I wore out Metallica records the same way a previous generation would have done with Zeppelin. I kind of regret that now, because in the scheme of things they really weren't that good. And my guitar tone preferences were pretty "modern", though I got into the blues end of things later on, partly on account of my interest in tube amps.

    I pretty much agree with Wilder's observations there, except for one thing. I also found that it's easy to get that big, thumping low end at medium volumes, but when you try to make it at gig volumes it just falls apart and mushes up, unless you have a huge power amp and lots of powerful speakers like EVM12Ls.

    So instead of lugging some gigantic stack, the fix I humbly suggest is to leave the percussive attack and thumping low end to the drummer and bassist. That's what they're there for! You can use a reasonably sized amp (though "reasonable" isn't a very metal concept!) and instead of using the EQ to scoop out the midrange, use it to focus whatever power the amp has into a really violent buzzsaw grind. You also need less gain once the power tubes start distorting.

    There's nothing to stop you cranking up the bass and getting that heavy, thumping tone from the same amp when you're practicing on your own. But I think it's an important concept, this idea that there's no single "ultimate tone". There's just the right tone for the situation, and it can be completely different depending on how loud you're playing, what style of music you're playing, what size of venue you're playing, and who you're playing with.

    And I think a good modern amp design should be able to rise to that challenge. You should be able to get lots of juicy distortion at any volume if you want it, from the preamp alone, or if you're playing loud, from the power amp too. And enough tone and EQ knobs to shape the sound in the way I described.


    "They want the f***ing moon on a stick" as an old colleague of mine used to say.
    Not a mosher, but definitely an 80s metal head.

    My whole point has to do with that new amp model I was telling you about that I'm designing as one of my amp products specifically for heavy metal. Which is why I opted for the dual rail supply setup, super stiff power supply and 2 x 6550/KT88s. I've decided to do a two power transformer setup with plate/heaters on one transformer while the screens/bias are on the other.

    So far if my math is correct -

    600Va
    300Vg2
    5k Za-a
    Ig2 (max signal) = 2 x 15mA

    600V / 1250 = 480mA peak current

    So for the plate/heater transformer this would call for -

    450VAC x 500mA = 225
    6.3V x 6A = 37.8

    So that transformer would need a VA rating of 262.8...round up to 265VA.

    For the screen/bias transformer I figure 150mA on that winding. It will be a 225-0-225 ran with a grounded center tap and a dual polarity FWB rectifier for both screen and bias supplies.

    225 x 150mA = VA = 33.75

    We'll round up to VA=35 for that one.

    For a total VA of 300.

    Here's the scheme. Not quite finalized yet...just the best one that I've come up with so far. With the cap values and choke shown I'm thinkin' this power amp should be one stiff bastard.

    Last edited by Wilder Amplification; 03-14-2010, 12:37 PM.
    Jon Wilder
    Wilder Amplification

    Originally posted by m-fine
    I don't know about you, but I find it a LOT easier to change a capacitor than to actually learn how to play well
    Originally posted by JoeM
    I doubt if any of my favorite players even own a soldering iron.

    Comment


    • #17
      Did you build your new power supply yet Jon?

      jamie

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by imaradiostar View Post
        Did you build your new power supply yet Jon?

        jamie
        Not yet...the plate tranny's being custom wound as we speak.
        Jon Wilder
        Wilder Amplification

        Originally posted by m-fine
        I don't know about you, but I find it a LOT easier to change a capacitor than to actually learn how to play well
        Originally posted by JoeM
        I doubt if any of my favorite players even own a soldering iron.

        Comment


        • #19
          Color me simple, but what's the point of a second winding just for the screens? I've seen it recommended several times, but a sufficiently high power resistor (14ma max for 2 x KT-88 screens, dropping 300v gets me to 4.2 watts) and a parallel supply will get you 300vDC. Is it a voltage sag issue?
          -Mike

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by defaced View Post
            Is it a voltage sag issue?
            That's exactly what it is. With a 22K power resistor, at full output it would drop 300V, but under no signal at idle it would only drop 44V, and this keeps it in "sliding screen" operation. On top of which, when the plate supply starts sagging that puts the screen voltage once again at the mercy of the plate supply voltage.

            The amp this power supply will be feeding is made to be tight which is why I'm building it for fixed screen operation.
            Last edited by Wilder Amplification; 04-03-2010, 05:09 AM.
            Jon Wilder
            Wilder Amplification

            Originally posted by m-fine
            I don't know about you, but I find it a LOT easier to change a capacitor than to actually learn how to play well
            Originally posted by JoeM
            I doubt if any of my favorite players even own a soldering iron.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by defaced View Post
              Color me simple, but what's the point of a second winding just for the screens? I've seen it recommended several times, but a sufficiently high power resistor (14ma max for 2 x KT-88 screens, dropping 300v gets me to 4.2 watts) and a parallel supply will get you 300vDC. Is it a voltage sag issue?
              mike,

              he's basically trying to keep the headroom, transconductance/gain high even under large signal conditions. It is common fare amongst bass amps such as the SVT. I don't know how much of an issue this is for what we are used to though.

              Comment


              • #22
                Ah, I getscha. Would a simple zener regulator work for this? Say like three 100v zeners in series?
                -Mike

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by defaced View Post
                  Ah, I getscha. Would a simple zener regulator work for this? Say like three 100v zeners in series?
                  No, ..... well........ depending on what you are talking about. in the most common configuration you see in guitar amps, the choke already passively regulates, and I doubt the zener shunt would be able to match the performance of a choke TBH, as it is kinda the low man on the regulator totem pole. not even considering the possible dropping out of regulation which is another issue as well. You also now have to consider that you are bound to a supply of less than 300 for the PI and preamp, but again I'm just assuming I know what you are asking.... because I'm kinda drunk, and it's like 3:00 am

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Basically just my way of building a "data sheet correct" amplifier. One with an output section that stays tight at high volumes and uses a high gain style preamp...something the metal guys are sure to love.

                    I'm honestly not sure why you think that this type of supply is anymore "complex" than a single rail sliding screen supply. If you look at the schematic, you'll see that it doesn't take anymore filter caps than a stock 100 watt Marshall and the cost of my custom wound plate tranny along with the Hammond screen tranny adds up to about the same cost as the MetroAmp Dagnall 1203-80 clone PTs so the economics of it are the same. The only real difference is the addition of a separate screen tranny and a few more rectifiers.

                    Again the idea here is to NOT have the power amp clip at high volume. I know to some people this sounds "sacrilege" and goes against everything about why people think tube guitar amps are what they are and seems to counteract the reason we run tube amps and that some people are thinking "Well if you're gonna do that then why not go solid state?" but there is a reason why Ampeg did this with the SVT and the reason why Marshall did it with the VBA400, and also the reason why the HiWatt DR series were done this way as well. Even with a tube power amp that is tight/defined/clean there are certain tonal characteristics that tubes have that transistors don't that will be retained in this design. And let's face it...not everyone who likes tubes runs them into power amp clipping anymore (matter of fact only a small percentage of us do anymore) so IMHO that renders that argument a moot point.
                    Last edited by Wilder Amplification; 04-03-2010, 08:30 AM.
                    Jon Wilder
                    Wilder Amplification

                    Originally posted by m-fine
                    I don't know about you, but I find it a LOT easier to change a capacitor than to actually learn how to play well
                    Originally posted by JoeM
                    I doubt if any of my favorite players even own a soldering iron.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'm not arguing with your approach in any way (and if I implied it somewhere, my apologies). I am a full on modern metal head and your goal is my goal. I want a power amp that can slam the shit out of my speakers and not distort until my ears are bleeding. I'm currently doing it with 4 X KT-88, 550 plate and 545 screen (and sufficiently large screen resistors), but I've got a list of things I want to try:

                      DC Coupled cathode followers (MOSFET for sure, maybe tube)
                      MOSFET Phase Inverter
                      Class D SS power amp
                      Ultra Linear operation
                      And now with this thread, stiff, low(er) voltage, screen supply

                      It's not so much I think your approach is more complicated, it's just that I've seen people use two discrete transformers (Black Labb's big bass amp), or custom wound iron (you), and neither approach is easy for the retro-fitter type (me). So using my limited understanding of solid state electronics, I'm trying to figure out a way to pull this rabbit out of a hat. And like in my SMPS preamp power supply thread, it's an excuse to try/learn something.

                      Attached is a first cut of what I was thinking. Parallel supply, but using the zener to "regulate" the screens. I'm sure it could be optimized, but I don't want to take over Jon's thread any more than I already have.
                      Attached Files
                      -Mike

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by defaced View Post
                        Class D SS power amp
                        This has become a favorite over at the mother ship with the Italian constituents. Carlo keeps on going on an on about the one he built. He's into metal core, and his whole company slogan of "our clean channel is your high gain", may be some indication.... I dunno.

                        I also think that other 'clown" uses high a power ultralinear KT-88 output section in this amplifiers. If you like the sound of his stuff, I could probably draw you a scheme of his model, since he left gut shots up at one point, and all the 'original" design is based all the open source mods available there, and some he eve fished for.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Class-D can be made to work, but like it says in RFC 1925, "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."

                          I've messed around with Class-D amps for guitar, and had mixed results. I built a clone of a Bassman preamp out of JFETs, and hooked it up to one of the 400 watt Coldamp modules with the matching switchmode power supply. My intention was to sell the preamp as a kit. I was just starting to get a reasonable tone out of it when the Coldamp stuff exploded on me, shooting lumps of MOSFET across my kitchen, and that kind of put a stop to the project.

                          There's so much more to a guitar amp than the way it sounds: mostly the way it looks, the advertising copy, and what famous musician you can get to endorse it.

                          You don't need custom transformers to do the dual rail thing.

                          Broadly speaking I agree with Jon Wilder's argument. My old Ninja Toaster was built along the lines he proposes, and it will do this super evil tone with lots of gain, chunking bass and scooped mids, but it can only do that at low or medium volume. Once the power amp section starts to clip, or the speaker runs out of excursion, those settings just sound bad.

                          The power tubes and PI do something, though. I tried running its preamp out into a solid-state power amp, and it didn't sound quite so br00tal.

                          For me, the ultimate metal amp will always be Ken Gilbert's BAGA. I heard a clip of it once, and it sounded like you were trapped inside a giant V8 on full throttle. The power stage of it probably still was running clean.
                          Last edited by Steve Conner; 04-03-2010, 07:58 PM.
                          "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Steve Conner View Post
                            Class-D can be made to work, but like it says in RFC 1925, "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."

                            I've messed around with Class-D amps for guitar, and had mixed results. I built a clone of a Bassman preamp out of JFETs, and hooked it up to one of the 400 watt Coldamp modules with the matching switchmode power supply. My intention was to sell the preamp as a kit. I was just starting to get a reasonable tone out of it when the Coldamp stuff exploded on me, shooting lumps of MOSFET across my kitchen, and that kind of put a stop to the project.

                            There's so much more to a guitar amp than the way it sounds: mostly the way it looks, the advertising copy, and what famous musician you can get to endorse it.

                            You don't need custom transformers to do the dual rail thing.

                            Broadly speaking I agree with Jon Wilder's argument. My old Ninja Toaster was built along the lines he proposes, and it will do this super evil tone with lots of gain, chunking bass and scooped mids, but it can only do that at low or medium volume. Once the power amp section starts to clip, or the speaker runs out of excursion, those settings just sound bad.

                            The power tubes and PI do something, though. I tried running its preamp out into a solid-state power amp, and it didn't sound quite so br00tal.

                            For me, the ultimate metal amp will always be Ken Gilbert's BAGA. I heard a clip of it once, and it sounded like you were trapped inside a giant V8 on full throttle. The power stage of it probably still was running clean.
                            The reason I elected to get a custom plate x-former was because I couldn't find anyone who carried a 450VAC @ 500mA x-former as an "off the shelf" part.

                            The whole point behind doing a dual rail supply with two separate x-formers was to keep one rail from having any effect on the other. I didn't want the plate supply to affect the screen supply if it were to sag under high current demand. Although it shouldn't with the overspec'ed HT winding, 'on paper' and 'practical application' as we know are two different things.

                            @defaced, I noticed among your list of things to try you mentioned Ultra Linear. Only because I'm curious, is there any reason as to why you'd go that route? It's very similar to sliding screen, but the drawback is that they don't like to be pushed into clipping since screen current goes through the roof when this happens and since the screens are connected directly to the OT primary via the UL taps, the UL OTs simply can't take it. Granted the dual rail amp I'm doing is being made NOT to go into clipping, but should it reach that point it's not going to take out the OT like a UL amp that just happened to go into clipping would. I have no experience with UL operation at all, but due to the way it works that is what I'm thinking.
                            Jon Wilder
                            Wilder Amplification

                            Originally posted by m-fine
                            I don't know about you, but I find it a LOT easier to change a capacitor than to actually learn how to play well
                            Originally posted by JoeM
                            I doubt if any of my favorite players even own a soldering iron.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              UL is for one reason: I'm currently using an OT that can do it (Hammond 1650T). At the very least, I feel I should try it. From what I have read from discussion on this forum, screen resistors are a smart thing to use in UL mode, and those would keep the screens from drawing excessive current. If you don't mind my asking, what about your design keeps the power amp from going into clipping? Is it the fixed screen voltage?

                              Joey, if you have the pictures of that UL amp, I'd be interested in looking at them. I can't imagine there's too much to it, but I've been wrong before.
                              -Mike

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Whatever happened to Ken Gilbert anyway? Knowledgeable old timers like he, Ray Ivers, and others have up and disappeared over the last couple years.....

                                Greg

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X