Well, sort of. As all analogies, this one should also be taken with a grain of salt.
To achive closer results to what you imagine, we should use dual, coupled, different value pots, one optimized for bass, the other for mids, and clearly that is not happening.
It would be somewhat more precise to say that on full bass, the mid resistor gets shorted and on minimum bass the bass capacitor gets the axe.
Now, on intermediate positions .... well, that's anybody's guess.
That's why you get a correlation between real life and simulation on both ends, (and also on "5"", if the bass pot is linear) but not, say, on 2 or 7.
Not *that* important either, since we tune by ear.
EDIT: I forgot. Personally I'm happy with "close enough" results, and mentally calculate, remembering= ".1 and 100K=16Hz." (my magic values).
Based on that you can go anywhere; in fact I calculated Fc would be "around 3200Hz", close enough.
What did I do?; please follow me: 100000pF(.1)/50pF(47pF)=10000/5=2000X higher frequency, *but* the resistor is 10X (1000000r/100000r) so the frequency shift is 1/10 of 2000.
So: Fc=16Hz(my "magic" value)x200=3200Hz. Close enough, faster than grabbing a (not always available) calculator and punching the numbers.
I also consider .22 approx. 2x .1 ; .47 2x .22 ; .39 practically the same as .47 and so on. Good to navigate quickly through a schematic having a quite accurate idea of where I am standing.
Anyway I *will* have to use normalized component values
To achive closer results to what you imagine, we should use dual, coupled, different value pots, one optimized for bass, the other for mids, and clearly that is not happening.
It would be somewhat more precise to say that on full bass, the mid resistor gets shorted and on minimum bass the bass capacitor gets the axe.
Now, on intermediate positions .... well, that's anybody's guess.
That's why you get a correlation between real life and simulation on both ends, (and also on "5"", if the bass pot is linear) but not, say, on 2 or 7.
Not *that* important either, since we tune by ear.
EDIT: I forgot. Personally I'm happy with "close enough" results, and mentally calculate, remembering= ".1 and 100K=16Hz." (my magic values).
Based on that you can go anywhere; in fact I calculated Fc would be "around 3200Hz", close enough.
What did I do?; please follow me: 100000pF(.1)/50pF(47pF)=10000/5=2000X higher frequency, *but* the resistor is 10X (1000000r/100000r) so the frequency shift is 1/10 of 2000.
So: Fc=16Hz(my "magic" value)x200=3200Hz. Close enough, faster than grabbing a (not always available) calculator and punching the numbers.
I also consider .22 approx. 2x .1 ; .47 2x .22 ; .39 practically the same as .47 and so on. Good to navigate quickly through a schematic having a quite accurate idea of where I am standing.
Anyway I *will* have to use normalized component values
Comment