The OT is burned up in the Studio Bass.
Mercury Magnetics has a replacement transformer (Mercury Magnetics -- The Guitar Amp Transformer Company), but I would like to use a Hammond "Classic" Audio
Push-Pull, Ultra-Linear Easy Wire - Tube Output transformer instead. (Hammond Mfg.-"Classic" Push-Pull-Easy Wire-Tube Output Transformers - (1608A-1620A, 1645A & 1650A Series))
Since the Fender Studio Bass is about 180 to 200 watts, it appears the only choice for the Hammond Easy Wire is the 1650WA.
According to this thread http://music-electronics-forum.com/t26091/ , if you want to put a Hammond Easy Wire into a Twin Reverb, the 1650TA is the correct choice.
It seems strange that the 1650WA and 1650TA have the same primary impedance, 1,900 ct.
Considering the Twin uses four 6l6GC's and the Studio Bass uses six 6l6GC's, it appears it might be wrong to use 1,900 ct for the Studio Bass.
Hammond says "How you operate the tubes (push-pull, push-pull parallel, ultra-linear, class, B+, bias, operating points, etc.) will change optimum plate to plate load impedance."
Will the 1650WA work well in the Studio Bass? (Is 1,900 ct an optimum plate to plate load impedance for the Studio Bass?)
If so, how might the tubes in the Studio Bass be operating differently than the tubes in the Twin that allows both amps to have the same optimum plate to plate load impedance?
Mercury Magnetics has a replacement transformer (Mercury Magnetics -- The Guitar Amp Transformer Company), but I would like to use a Hammond "Classic" Audio
Push-Pull, Ultra-Linear Easy Wire - Tube Output transformer instead. (Hammond Mfg.-"Classic" Push-Pull-Easy Wire-Tube Output Transformers - (1608A-1620A, 1645A & 1650A Series))
Since the Fender Studio Bass is about 180 to 200 watts, it appears the only choice for the Hammond Easy Wire is the 1650WA.
According to this thread http://music-electronics-forum.com/t26091/ , if you want to put a Hammond Easy Wire into a Twin Reverb, the 1650TA is the correct choice.
It seems strange that the 1650WA and 1650TA have the same primary impedance, 1,900 ct.
Considering the Twin uses four 6l6GC's and the Studio Bass uses six 6l6GC's, it appears it might be wrong to use 1,900 ct for the Studio Bass.
Hammond says "How you operate the tubes (push-pull, push-pull parallel, ultra-linear, class, B+, bias, operating points, etc.) will change optimum plate to plate load impedance."
Will the 1650WA work well in the Studio Bass? (Is 1,900 ct an optimum plate to plate load impedance for the Studio Bass?)
If so, how might the tubes in the Studio Bass be operating differently than the tubes in the Twin that allows both amps to have the same optimum plate to plate load impedance?
Comment