I've just built a bass amp with a power amp section capable of 160W of headroom. It uses 4 KT88/6550 power tubes and is driven by a long tail pair phase inverter with a 6SL7 tube.
The problem is I'm only getting about 60W rms output before the PI runs out of headroom and starts clipping. I've confirmed this with a dual trace scope with the input to one channel across the load and the other at one of the PI plates.
My assumption is that the signal output from the PI is being loaded down too much at the power tube grids. I have a bias arrangement with a bias pot for each power tube so each tube has a grid leak of 120k. The grids are separated from each other by the coupling caps. However, as I understand, they wind up in parallel with respect to the output of the PI as far as AC is concerned. This would mean each half of the PI is seeing an impedance of only 60K plus whatever else is in the ground path as I understand. I believe this to be the immediate cause of the problem.
I tried decreasing the PI plate resistors from 100K to 50k and values in between to see if that helped with the loading problem but to no avail.
I'm a little reluctant to start increasing the values of the grid leaks as I'm aware they need to be lower for KT88's/6550's. However, I'm not interested in trying to overdrive the power amp or squeeze the most power possible out ot the tubes so perhaps this is a reasonable option. I've seen other 4 x 6550 designs that have one gridleak of 100k for each pair of tubes. However, since I have a separate grid leak for each tube could I not use at least twice the value than for a shared gridleak? If that's not equivalent then I may have to go with only two bias pots (1 for each pair of tubes) to get a higher impedance.
Perhaps the 6SL7 is not up to the task of driving a power section like this? I understand the 12AT7 should be able to but that's an awkward switch because of the octal socket of the 6SL7. Are there any adapters for octal sockets to 9 pin. Would a 6SN7 be able to drive this load better? That would be an easy switch.
Tube cathode followers to provide the drive needed are out of the question as there's no physical room or heater capacity for another tube. I've read about MOSFETS providing the same function but I don't think either of these should be necessary since I'm not trying to drive grids positive or distort the power section or anything like that. Just trying to get max clean output power.
Right now I'm only able to get a 32 V peak signal to the power amp. I figure I need at least a 50 - 60 V peak signal to get to the max headroom of the power amp and get full output power.
Any advice with this dilema I'm facing would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Greg
Edit: should have added there is negative feedback going from the 8 Ohm tap of the OT the the other input of the PI. The series resistor is 150K and shunt is 4.7K
The problem is I'm only getting about 60W rms output before the PI runs out of headroom and starts clipping. I've confirmed this with a dual trace scope with the input to one channel across the load and the other at one of the PI plates.
My assumption is that the signal output from the PI is being loaded down too much at the power tube grids. I have a bias arrangement with a bias pot for each power tube so each tube has a grid leak of 120k. The grids are separated from each other by the coupling caps. However, as I understand, they wind up in parallel with respect to the output of the PI as far as AC is concerned. This would mean each half of the PI is seeing an impedance of only 60K plus whatever else is in the ground path as I understand. I believe this to be the immediate cause of the problem.
I tried decreasing the PI plate resistors from 100K to 50k and values in between to see if that helped with the loading problem but to no avail.
I'm a little reluctant to start increasing the values of the grid leaks as I'm aware they need to be lower for KT88's/6550's. However, I'm not interested in trying to overdrive the power amp or squeeze the most power possible out ot the tubes so perhaps this is a reasonable option. I've seen other 4 x 6550 designs that have one gridleak of 100k for each pair of tubes. However, since I have a separate grid leak for each tube could I not use at least twice the value than for a shared gridleak? If that's not equivalent then I may have to go with only two bias pots (1 for each pair of tubes) to get a higher impedance.
Perhaps the 6SL7 is not up to the task of driving a power section like this? I understand the 12AT7 should be able to but that's an awkward switch because of the octal socket of the 6SL7. Are there any adapters for octal sockets to 9 pin. Would a 6SN7 be able to drive this load better? That would be an easy switch.
Tube cathode followers to provide the drive needed are out of the question as there's no physical room or heater capacity for another tube. I've read about MOSFETS providing the same function but I don't think either of these should be necessary since I'm not trying to drive grids positive or distort the power section or anything like that. Just trying to get max clean output power.
Right now I'm only able to get a 32 V peak signal to the power amp. I figure I need at least a 50 - 60 V peak signal to get to the max headroom of the power amp and get full output power.
Any advice with this dilema I'm facing would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Greg
Edit: should have added there is negative feedback going from the 8 Ohm tap of the OT the the other input of the PI. The series resistor is 150K and shunt is 4.7K
Comment