Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Inductor based mid boost via cathode

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Inductor based mid boost via cathode

    Anyone played with this idea? The only commercial example I know of is the second revision Sunn Model T. I had one of the early ones, but not the "red" version, so I don't know what it sounds like. Or if there's problems with hum pickup.

    Here's the Sunn implementation:
    http://www.angelfire.com/blog/sunnmo...delt2schem.gif

    Now my Dean Markley Signature amp has an op amp based active mid that works really well, but they derive a dual rail supply via the bias tap and I don't like that. Makes me nervous that the bias could get dragged down in the event of op amp or zener failure.
    The farmer takes a wife, the barber takes a pole....

  • #2
    I did it, using a bunch of op-amps to simulate the inductor.

    If bias failure worries you, fuse the connection from the bias tap to the op-amp power supply. Something like a 63 or 100mA fuse. That's what I did. It's been 12 years and the fuse hasn't gone yet.
    "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

    Comment


    • #3
      Ampeg V4 ?
      Originally posted by Enzo
      I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


      Comment


      • #4
        From my experience the V2-4 is quite prone to hum pickup.
        The farmer takes a wife, the barber takes a pole....

        Comment


        • #5
          Yup. Neat circuit. Hummy. I've wanted to use an inductor for the same type of circuit but have avoided it for this reason. I may still try it with careful layout. But I won't be surprised if it hums anyway. Shielding the inductor is also a possibility. But if the shield, which should probably be copper or steel, is too close to the inductor you'll change the semiconductive properties. So you'd need a little real estate to make it work.
          "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

          "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

          "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
          You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

          Comment


          • #6
            I once built the a similar control into and orange amp clone. although I now understand why it hummed so bad... It should ahve made sense then that the inductor might put up a lot of noise

            http://www.orangefieldguide.com/OFG_...0_72output.jpg


            I believe this is pretty simelar to the control in those Model T's

            Does anyone have a formula for calculating this kind of controls response?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tage View Post
              Does anyone have a formula for calculating this kind of controls response?
              Ya well, simple enough... It's resonant frequency equals 5.1911e+3 Hertz.
              Normally I'd punch it out on my HP 11C, but I found this link for others to refer to.

              http://www.1728.org/resfreq.htm



              I would need the DCR of the coil to calculate the circuit Q, to determine the circuits 3db bandwidth..


              Also, as a side note, the inductor could be shielded or wound on a toroid to help abate any induced hum issues...
              -g
              ______________________________________
              Gary Moore
              Moore Amplifiication
              mooreamps@hotmail.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mooreamps View Post
                Ya well, simple enough... It's resonant frequency equals 5.1911e+3 Hertz.
                Normally I'd punch it out on my HP 11C, but I found this link for others to refer to.

                [url]http://www.1728.org/resfreq.htm
                Seeing the 5 and hertz threw me off, but I see now how they are showing power of 3, so 5.1911e+3 Hertz is 5.191Khz.
                The part I don't get is where they say "the formula also holds true if used with the units of microhenries and microfarads."
                How can 2000x.47 used within the formula give the same result as .002x.00000047 ?
                I think they omitted that the solution will then be in Mhz, not hz.
                Originally posted by Enzo
                I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by g-one View Post
                  Seeing the 5 and hertz threw me off, but I see now how they are showing power of 3, so 5.1911e+3 Hertz is 5.191Khz.
                  The part I don't get is where they say "the formula also holds true if used with the units of microhenries and microfarads."
                  How can 2000x.47 used within the formula give the same result as .002x.00000047 ?
                  I think they omitted that the solution will then be in Mhz, not hz.
                  Well, then work the solution yourself on a calculator, even using the scientific calculator provided to you from Windows.. You should see the same result..
                  ______________________________________
                  Gary Moore
                  Moore Amplifiication
                  mooreamps@hotmail.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Forget it, I notified them and they have corrected the wording on the website calculator.
                    Originally posted by Enzo
                    I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm really starting to like this circuit... I've cobbled up different values than the one's shown here. It can be switchable between either a mid-boost or a mid-scoop.
                      I'll also make the pass-band selectable between two different ranges.... "Sweet"....

                      -g
                      ______________________________________
                      Gary Moore
                      Moore Amplifiication
                      mooreamps@hotmail.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        if you dc-lift bias the triode and use a larger cathode resistor (I've been using 10k..33k) you can make the boost appear even more big.
                        This has an added effect that the inductor can be smaller. I made the inductors by winding around an inch length of an plastic felt tip pen tube about 3mm thick layer of wire. Then glued a 6mm nut on one end.
                        Inserted a 6x40 mm screw and a locking nut, drilled a 6mm hole to chassis, and got myself a tweakable inductor.
                        Works like a charm and does not pick any hum.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Wait... The inductor value can be smaller for a higher impedance circuit?!? Isn't that backwards?
                          "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                          "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                          "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                          You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Wont the impedance only affect the Q of the control? not the frequency it is centered at? I wouldn't think the impedance would affect the equation presented earlier by mooreamps

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I was a little confused when I looked at that calculator and found no impedance parameter. In other SPICE type calculators impedance does make a difference. But I'm formula impaired so I could be missing the point of something here.
                              "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                              "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                              "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                              You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X