Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Looking for a tremolo circuit.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Looking for a tremolo circuit.

    I'm building an amplifier in which I like to have tremolo. I'm thinking a opto-bug tremolo that dumps signal to ground (but I'm open to suggestions). Anyone got a circuit or could anyone point out a nice tremolo circuit?

    Cheer!
    In this forum everyone is entitled to my opinion.

  • #2
    Originally posted by überfuzz View Post
    IAnyone got a circuit or could anyone point out a nice tremolo circuit?
    Garden variety trems:

    BF style with 1 x 12AX7 and LDR bug wiggling the pre-amp signal is quite smooth trem

    Bias vary trem at output tubes (5G9 or 6G9B, 6G16) is more dramatic hypnotic bang for buck


    Other, real-estate hungry, 'trems':

    Brown harmonic trem (if you have room for 2 or 3 extra 12AX7s)

    Maggie 260 "trem" with the 4 hard-to-find (and expensive) varistors in the resistance/capacitance bridge and several 12AU7s or 6CG7s

    Vox AC30 'trem' with heaps of caps, resistors and a 12AX7 and a 12AU7

    Hammond Organ 'trem' with a SR in a resistance/reactance bridge, and a couple of 12AU7s in addition to the LFO stage (needs the most real-estate to implement, but sounds quite spectacular)

    Ampeg trem (uses photoresistors)
    Schematic
    Last edited by tubeswell; 04-21-2012, 05:46 AM.
    Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

    "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tubeswell View Post
      Bias vary trem at output tubes (5G9 or 6G9B, 6G16) is more dramatic hypnotic bang for buck
      I'll start by mentioning that this is a great rundown of typical tube trem circuits. Thank you. Now...

      Wouldn't the 470k cathode follower arrangement of the above mentioned amps cause a problem with most currently available preamp tubes? I'm looking at implementing a power tube bias vary trem and I've been trying to find alternative coupling examples because of the New Sensor preamp tube cathode problems. I'll be modulating EL34's so I won't need quite as much swing. I'm hoping that a 100k cathode resistor will be enough. By going with 100k cathode and elevating the filaments on a 50VDC bias I'm hoping to avoid the need to use only certain tubes for the trem circuit.
      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
        Wouldn't the 470k cathode follower arrangement of the above mentioned amps cause a problem with most currently available preamp tubes?
        If 'currently available' = modern production, then sadly admittedly, yes.

        In the last 3 bias-wary trem amps I've built, I've used a mosfet source follower (in place of the CF) to successfully overcome this issue.

        In another amp I used a cathode-biased CF stage (with a 100k load) AC-coupled to the LFO, whereupon the cathode voltage came to 172V (with 426 HT), and it held up pretty well. (Prior to that I had a DC-coupled CF and the cathode voltage was around 220). You could possibly even go to a 56k load resistor this way and get the cathode voltage down further. You lose a bit of swing, but there's plenty of current. Another way would be level-shifting.
        Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

        "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the input fellas! Although it almost led to a technical overload.

          At first glance the Ampeg tremolo looks kind of complicated. Then most seem to have serious tube craving. If I beg on my knees, could I see you mosfet circuit? I've tried to make one myself without any success...

          I really like like the ab763 for the simplicity, but it would be fun to try something new.
          In this forum everyone is entitled to my opinion.

          Comment


          • #6
            Remember that the oscillators of most vib/trem circuits are largely the same, and given that they're not in the audio chain can be replaced with mosfets a la R.G. Keen's "Solid State Replacement for the Fender Tremolo" available here http://www.geofex.com/Article_Folder.../sstremolo.htm. This can certainly free up a stage (or two as in the "brownface" trem) allowing the choice to go with a more complex trem not be limited by number of tube stages available. As written up here it's essentially a drop-in replacement for many of the Fender tremolos, but shouldn't require too much tweaking for any other trem circuit.

            tubeswell - have you had any experience with either the AC30 or Ampeg trems? Any opinions on the sound of these? I love the "harmonic" trem I did in a SE combo but want to branch out and try a different "phasery" option.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rathmann View Post
              tubeswell - have you had any experience with either the AC30 or Ampeg trems? Any opinions on the sound of these? I love the "harmonic" trem I did in a SE combo but want to branch out and try a different "phasery" option.
              Nah - I just happened to come across to after I'd built the Hammond Organ vibrato unit and someone pointed out to me that Ampeg had done a similar thing with photoresistors (instead of an SR unit) , which I thought looked cool. I do like the sound of the SR unit vibrato, and I guess its possibly a bit 'smoother' than the Ampeg version, because of the reactance bridge, but the SR units are relative cheap (like US$20 on e-bay) so whether the photoresistors are much of an economic advantage for a one-off build its hard to say. But I sure would be interested to hear the Ampeg version.
              Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

              "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by überfuzz View Post
                Thanks for the input fellas! Although it almost led to a technical overload.

                At first glance the Ampeg tremolo looks kind of complicated. Then most seem to have serious tube craving. If I beg on my knees, could I see you mosfet circuit? I've tried to make one myself without any success...

                I really like like the ab763 for the simplicity, but it would be fun to try something new.
                Apart from the link to R.G.'s fet circuit in rathmann's post, here is a simple version of the source follower I use with a normal LFO triode stage:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	6968856876_0578a98e54_b.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	35.8 KB
ID:	824862
                Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

                "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

                Comment


                • #9
                  I am gathering the last few parts needed to take a junked AM/FM radio and convert it into this, a Valco/Supro/Gretsch amp on a small, Champ-like scale. This schematic is not completely as originally drawn - I photo-edited the trem section to make it easier for me to follow and to add an INTENSITY control - but none of the values are any different.

                  Has anyone got an opinion on/experience with this circuit?

                  I am planning to try embiggening the cap values in the oscillator to slow it down if needed, based on a comment I read . . . somewhere . . . .

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	gretsch6151-supro16t-EDIT.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	903.7 KB
ID:	824870

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by tubeswell View Post
                    Hammond Organ 'trem' with a SR in a resistance/reactance bridge, and a couple of 12AU7s in addition to the LFO stage (needs the most real-estate to implement, but sounds quite spectacular)
                    Which Hammond 'trem' are you talking about here? The tonewheel organs from 1945 to 1975 need a rotating multi-pole air capacitor (the scanner) in addition to the phase delay line and a complicated multi-contact switch to vary the depth. The pre-1945 organs had a "tremulant" that was also operated by the organ's run motor.

                    I have heard of one or two people adapting the scanner and phase delay line as a stand-alone vibrato/chorus unit, but it's rare.

                    David

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rhodesplyr View Post
                      Which Hammond 'trem' are you talking about here?
                      http://music-electronics-forum.com/t27630/

                      In this one I used an AO-47 saturable reactor unit from a Hammond Organ vibrato. I've got another SR unit I'm saving for a combo build
                      Last edited by tubeswell; 04-29-2012, 07:37 AM.
                      Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

                      "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X