The 5150/6505 is known for it's kind of annoying fizzy/grind/buzzy sound when played solo. But the real reason for it's popularity with metal bands is the fact that it sounds absolutely crushing in the mix with little relative effort (and is dirt cheap!). The 6505+ to my ears is slightly clearer but still sounds verrrrry similar.
The only thing the 5150 and the SLO have in common is the cold-clipping stage and a couple of cathode bias/plate resistors (though the overall topology of the circuit, apart from the extra gain stage is sort of similar - perhaps this is what people mean when they say 'brand a' copied 'brand b'). A major difference between the SLO and the 5150 is the fact that the SLO has a Direct-Coupled Cathode follower (while the 5150 has an anode follower - basically a gain stage with heavy feedback). I can say this probably has a large sonic difference, as I remember debating whether my marshall type build should have a cathode follower, or a DCCF. I tried both and preferred the DCCF as the more 'modern' sounding alternative. Dunno if it was any clearer though, I just liked the sound of it. The anode follower stage might even be driven into clipping, which would sound interesting given the large amount of feedback - that might account for some of the 5150 tone as well.
Personally, if I weren't interested in seeing how these things work, I'd scoot down to the local store and try out all the ENGL/Mesa/whatever amps before going through the nightmarish cycle of soldering/desoldering/listening/pullingmyhairout.
The only thing the 5150 and the SLO have in common is the cold-clipping stage and a couple of cathode bias/plate resistors (though the overall topology of the circuit, apart from the extra gain stage is sort of similar - perhaps this is what people mean when they say 'brand a' copied 'brand b'). A major difference between the SLO and the 5150 is the fact that the SLO has a Direct-Coupled Cathode follower (while the 5150 has an anode follower - basically a gain stage with heavy feedback). I can say this probably has a large sonic difference, as I remember debating whether my marshall type build should have a cathode follower, or a DCCF. I tried both and preferred the DCCF as the more 'modern' sounding alternative. Dunno if it was any clearer though, I just liked the sound of it. The anode follower stage might even be driven into clipping, which would sound interesting given the large amount of feedback - that might account for some of the 5150 tone as well.
Personally, if I weren't interested in seeing how these things work, I'd scoot down to the local store and try out all the ENGL/Mesa/whatever amps before going through the nightmarish cycle of soldering/desoldering/listening/pullingmyhairout.
Comment