I'm slow to get to a project that needs doing. I have a build with a noisy tube reverb (aren't they all to some degree?) and I need to try and quiet it down as much as possible. Not sure when I'll actually get to it but I'm penciling notes for when I do. And I was thinking...
The grid leak bias system is typically shunned for modern guitar amplifier inputs. I assume this is because it can barely handle a signal even as small as the average humbucker puts out. So, good, we just used the cathode bias arrangement and forsook the grid leak circuit completely. This change was done by most amp builders in the 50's, I think, before the advent of built in reverb. But the grid leak circuit should have the lowest noise for the most gain. That seems like a good thing then you must amplify an input signal no bigger than 10mV. So I guess my question is:
Is there any disadvantage to using the grid leak circuit as a reverb recovery stage? Also, is there any misconception on my part of the potential advantages? Other reverb noise issues not withstanding, using the grid leak circuit for recovery seems like a sensible start.
The grid leak bias system is typically shunned for modern guitar amplifier inputs. I assume this is because it can barely handle a signal even as small as the average humbucker puts out. So, good, we just used the cathode bias arrangement and forsook the grid leak circuit completely. This change was done by most amp builders in the 50's, I think, before the advent of built in reverb. But the grid leak circuit should have the lowest noise for the most gain. That seems like a good thing then you must amplify an input signal no bigger than 10mV. So I guess my question is:
Is there any disadvantage to using the grid leak circuit as a reverb recovery stage? Also, is there any misconception on my part of the potential advantages? Other reverb noise issues not withstanding, using the grid leak circuit for recovery seems like a sensible start.
Comment