Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hiwatts..
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View PostI think the filter capacitor is cheaper.
This was a madification to an existing commercial design. Depending on when he wanted to impliment these changes, he may have been designing this circuit around existing hardware and stock which had already been purchased. It may have been cheaper to make these changes with this design than adding an RC stage, particcularly when we know how much importance he placed on component layout and lead dress.If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoulFetish View Post... . Any ripple present at the HT would also show up at the grid via the divider ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Malcolm Irving View PostThis applies to the divider on the grid side of the CF as well. Any ripple on the grid of the CF would come out on the cathode, with a gain of almost 1. It is noticeable that the divider on the grid of the CF gets its HT from a highly smoothed power supply node.If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Malcolm Irving View PostTry scoping across the 100k resistor to see how much current is flowing through it. (Connection into the scope needs to be floating.)
In the older circuit, the signal was going through this triode, but it was still an 'almost 1' gain factor.
Whatever the electronic theory reasoning, this PI stays cleaner longer, and subjectively sounds much more dynamic and less squashed, even when clipping. I believe this was a design goal. Perhaps this is because the bias point does not shift as much with a heavy signal load.
As far as cost, Dave Reeves was not a modern penny-pinching MBA. ;-) He wanted to build what was, in his view, the best amplifier possible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mhuss View PostOf course there's current flowing through the 100k, into the virtual ground of the cathode output.
In the older circuit, the signal was going through this triode, but it was still an 'almost 1' gain factor.
Whatever the electronic theory reasoning, this PI stays cleaner longer, and subjectively sounds much more dynamic and less squashed, even when clipping. I believe this was a design goal. Perhaps this is because the bias point does not shift as much with a heavy signal load.
As far as cost, Dave Reeves was not a modern penny-pinching MBA. ;-) He wanted to build what was, in his view, the best amplifier possible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadrock2 View PostThe Hiwatt circuit in question not only provides bias for the PI but also provide an active presence boost and cut to enhance the presence effect.
Comment
-
I can't see how the voltage reference stage affects the presence circuit. You could use the same circuit for virtually any type of phase inverter.
Comment
Comment