Originally posted by dstrat
View Post
I'm not sure about the wider bandwidth thing coming from the OT. The lore definitely tells us that, but I'm not sure that the lore is 100% accurate. Trying to be objective about this and relying on numbers: Which Bassman are you referring to?
The most similar Bassman to compare to a SR is the Bassman 10. It uses the exact same power supply as the Super Reverb. Both are rated 40W at 5% THD and both meet the same specs. The amps have similarly weighty iron in the OT, yet both sound very different because of their different speaker compliments.
A 50W Bassman uses a more stout power supply and a bigger iron everywhere. It is rated for 50W at 5% THD. The Bassman 50 uses essentially the same preamp as the SR (without reverb and tremolo). It's not so much the preamps that are different in those amps, it's really the PS and the output stages that are different. that makes direct comparison difficult.
The 40W power supplies and OT are smaller than the 50W versions, which is to be expected because the 50W amps are producing 25% more power. 50W iron has to be bigger. But based on my experience using them as bass amps, the smaller size of the 40W iron seems to be attributable to their power ratings, not their frequency response. At least that's been my experience comparing the 40W vs. 50W Bassmen as bass amps. Both sets of electronics reach their stated goals.
To the extent that the AB763-type preamp stages all deliver the same signals, it's the power supplies, the output stages and the speakers that are different between those amps, and it seems that the answer would have to lie there. At their rated power all of these amps produce 5% THD. using that as a sort of equivalence assessment, I'm thinking that the differences in bass response largely come from the speakers/enclosures. The Bassmen have been outfitted with speakers that attempt to provide bass response, while the SR is definitely not outfitted with speakers having that same goal. Cabinet swaps suggest that the SR OT seems to be more capable of providing bass response than it's stock speakers are capable of reproducing. With that said, there is a fine line between enough bass response and too much bass response that causes Fender farting, so we commonly meddle with this by downsizing coupling caps in guitar amps.
To make a long answer short, I think that the difference in bass response isn't as attributable to the OT iron as the amp lore would suggest. The iron is sized for power and BW seems to be met in both the 40W and 50W amps. I think bass response is more a function of the speaker compliment. In an amp like the SR the speakers are definitely the weakest link when it comes to bass response. The 40W OT iron seems to be appropriately sized for BW, and with the right speakers/cabinet the smaller 40W OTs do a decent job at bass reproduction.
I wish I had a better answer.
Comment