Customer wants to disconnect the speaker in his Hammond M3 organ for use in his studio so there is no mic bleed. What is the best way to do this? It's a pair of 6V6s, so figure maybe 20 watts max? Can I just sub in a 30 - 50 watt 8 ohm resistor, or does changing from an impedence load to a resistive load play a part in this?
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Subbing a resistor for a speaker
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Randall View PostCustomer wants to disconnect the speaker in his Hammond M3 organ for use in his studio so there is no mic bleed. What is the best way to do this? It's a pair of 6V6s, so figure maybe 20 watts max? Can I just sub in a 30 - 50 watt 8 ohm resistor, or does changing from an impedence load to a resistive load play a part in this?
Of course there are fancy load 'resistors' that may approximate the way real speakers act - feel free to indulge if you want to spend lots of money and drive yourself crazy. Several threads exist about this I'm sure - search "ideal" speaker attenuator, something like that.This isn't the future I signed up for.
-
Originally posted by Randall View PostCustomer wants to disconnect the speaker in his Hammond M3 organ for use in his studio so there is no mic bleed. What is the best way to do this? It's a pair of 6V6s, so figure maybe 20 watts max? Can I just sub in a 30 - 50 watt 8 ohm resistor, or does changing from an impedence load to a resistive load play a part in this?Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence
Comment
-
The direct out is a rigged kluge involving a Radio Shack car stereo box of some kind. I don't remember exactly, it's been I while since I saw it. I will have another look when I install the amp later. Perhaps there is a better way to acheive a direct out, but I was thinking it was off the speaker connection.
Edit: I found this simple circuit for a line out. I get that it is a current divider, and that the 8 ohm load resistor is dissapating 99.9% of the current than the 21K parallel resistance, but what is the purpose of the 1K resistor? And what is the cap doing?
http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/LineOutFromASpinetLast edited by Randall; 06-14-2019, 01:51 AM.It's weird, because it WAS working fine.....
Comment
-
but what is the purpose of the 1K resistor? And what is the cap doing?
Not sure about the cap. It doesn't have a frequency shaping effect, so it could only block DC. In normal operation it should not be necessary.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Just to add to the what others are saying it's been common practice in guitar amp attenuators (and I see no reason for this to be a different application) to use a resistance a bit higher than the rated speaker load. I think the idea here must be that a rated speaker load is only observed in passing at very low frequencies and then for a time in the midrange frequencies with the impedance at other frequencies being higher (sometimes MUCH higher). So the nominal impedance of an actual speaker load is being considered as higher than it's rated impedance. It's also been observed (by some reports) that such attenuators that use a higher value resistive load than the rated speaker load requirement sound better than those which use a resistive load matching the rated speaker load. YMMV.
The Ho/Ultimate attenuator now uses an inductive load according to their literature. But I know that in 2009 when I asked about the units load at their NAMM show booth I was told they were using a 32 ohm resistive load for any amplifier plugged into the unit. The Trainwreck Airbrake load changes with attenuation settings, but also uses a similarly higher resistive load at most settings. Both attenuators have a good reputation for sound quality. Possibly others (Bad Cat leash?)Last edited by Chuck H; 06-14-2019, 02:54 PM."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
I am not in favour of using a dummy resistor having more than double the nominal output impedance, because that would result in excessive screen dissipation at high output power.
The impedance of a guitar speaker stays below twice its nominal value over most of the guitar's fundamental frequency range (up to around 2kHz), meaning that higher values at the frequency extremes don't contribute that much on average.
Regarding reliabilty it seems safest to stick with the nominal load impedance.
(The Ultimate Attenuator looks like a sloppy design anyway.)
Also the application concerned is not really a power attenuator that feeds a guitar speaker, so not necessarily the same sound criteria apply as with a guitar amp > power attenuator > guitar speaker arrangement.Last edited by Helmholtz; 06-14-2019, 03:47 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Randall View PostSo, any opinion on what would be the best value resistor for this application?
Here's a plot on the Ampeg BXE-115HL4 bass cabinet I have in the shop for general use with amps in for service. I calibrated the scale with resistor load connections on my 4kW load bank, so you can see the variation of a typical speaker (in this case, a ported cabinet).
In this instance, the speaker is a nominal 4 ohm value. Twice that is 8 ohms, so you can see from the graph a value twice your speaker will more than suffice for the task.Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence
Comment
-
Originally posted by Randall View PostSo, any opinion on what would be the best value resistor for this application?Last edited by Helmholtz; 06-14-2019, 08:54 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
Comment