Helmholtz:
I want to make sure I understand which scenarios we are talking about.
As the AC currents with bridge and two-phase rectification should differ by a factor of 1.414, only one of the formulas/factors for the DC current can be correct assuming the same conduction angle.
I think it should read IDC = 0.88 X Sec. IAC for two-phase cap input. This is #7 as shown in the photo? "Full Wave, Capacitor Input Load"?
This would lead to:
Iac = 1.14*Idc for two-phase
Iac = 1.61*Idc for bridge.
Again, Iac = 1.14*Idc for two-phase refers to #7 and Iac = 1.61*Idc for bridge refers to #6?
Thanks!!
Update: By the way, I am reading "Guitar Amplifiers Electronics, Basic Theory" by Richard Kuehnel. There is a section on Power Supplies Transformers. He covers "some" of what is being discussed here. So I am diving into the details as best I can.
I want to make sure I understand which scenarios we are talking about.
As the AC currents with bridge and two-phase rectification should differ by a factor of 1.414, only one of the formulas/factors for the DC current can be correct assuming the same conduction angle.
I think it should read IDC = 0.88 X Sec. IAC for two-phase cap input. This is #7 as shown in the photo? "Full Wave, Capacitor Input Load"?
This would lead to:
Iac = 1.14*Idc for two-phase
Iac = 1.61*Idc for bridge.
Again, Iac = 1.14*Idc for two-phase refers to #7 and Iac = 1.61*Idc for bridge refers to #6?
Thanks!!
Update: By the way, I am reading "Guitar Amplifiers Electronics, Basic Theory" by Richard Kuehnel. There is a section on Power Supplies Transformers. He covers "some" of what is being discussed here. So I am diving into the details as best I can.
Comment