Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A question about attenuation (input jacks)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A question about attenuation (input jacks)

    My understanding is that the classic voltage divider on the low sensitivity input jacks (classic Marshalls, Fender, etc.) has an attenuation of 6dB (division by four). What attenuation would the upper voltage divider have on the same low sensitivity input?
    The musical effect is good for my purpose but I am curious to know what attenuation it produces.

    Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	inputs2.jpg
Views:	226
Size:	31.3 KB
ID:	920084

  • #2
    The classic input voltage divider attenuates by a factor 68/136 = 0.5 corresponding to - 6 dB.

    The upper voltage divider in you picture attenuates by 120/167 = 0.72 corresponding to - 2.9 dB.

    Note that 6dB means 2 for voltage ratio but 4 for power ratio.
    Last edited by Helmholtz; 12-11-2020, 08:32 PM.
    - Own Opinions Only -

    Comment


    • #3
      About half the original, then. Very grateful, Helmholtz!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post

        The upper voltage divider in you picture attenuates by 120/167 = 0.72 corresponding to - 2.9 dB.
        Wouldn't that be 47/167 for the upper 'low' jack?

        Originally posted by Enzo
        I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by g1 View Post
          Wouldn't that be 47/167 for the upper 'low' jack?
          No, the 120k goes to ground.
          - Own Opinions Only -

          Comment


          • #6
            This input is too high.. this input is too low.. ah, this input is just right!
            -goldilocks
            If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
            If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
            We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
            MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by eschertron View Post
              -goldilocks
              ???????????
              - Own Opinions Only -

              Comment


              • #8
                Definition of Goldilocks (Entry 2 of 2)
                : having or producing an optimal balance usually between two extremes.
                ...

                The high input sounds perfect, but:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	bean5.jpg
Views:	211
Size:	43.3 KB
ID:	920105

                Comment


                • #9
                  I like the "Mr Bean" example... kind of fussy, hard to please in a non-rigorous way. Goldilocks IMHO was a spoiled, self-congratulatory brat.*






                  oh! I think that putdown (*) should be in the other thread.
                  If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
                  If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
                  We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
                  MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The formula for the attenuation in dB for a Voltage ratio is 20*log(V/V) . Use base 10 log.
                    WARNING! Musical Instrument amplifiers contain lethal voltages and can retain them even when unplugged. Refer service to qualified personnel.
                    REMEMBER: Everybody knows that smokin' ain't allowed in school !

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That top pair schematic is wrong and even if they wired it that way, it still is wrong, because it *always* pads down signal and to boot shows too low impedance to guitar pickup.

                      Starting with the correctly wired lower pair, which is what fender and 99% of manufacturers do, including Marshall, plugging a Guitar into the High (sensitivity) input, signal gets no resistive attenuation, is loaded by 1M resistor, and gets a combined "grid stopper" value of 34k ... what´s not to like?

                      Plugging into the Low (sensitivity) input gives you 2:1 or 6dB attenuation you get 136k//1M impedance and "grid stopper" becomes about same as before.
                      So far so good.

                      BUT

                      on top input pair:

                      1) you NEVER get unattenuated signal.

                      2) you NEVER get the benefit of high (1M) impedance

                      3) High (sensitivity) input is labelled WRONG because it now has the MOST ATTENUATION
                      47/167=0.28x=-11dB

                      4) Low (sensitivity) input is also WRONG because it has the LEAST ATTENUATION
                      120/167=0.72x=-2.9dB
                      Not THAT bad but unnecessary and input impedance is 100kish instead of desirable 1M

                      Now if they had not felt the URGE to use that top jack leaf switch, things would have been much better.
                      Juan Manuel Fahey

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
                        That top pair schematic is wrong and even if they wired it that way, it still is wrong, because it *always* pads down signal and to boot shows too low impedance to guitar pickup...

                        How this?

                        The upper input pair seems to be wired exactly as the lower pair, except that one of the 68k is replaced by 47k, the other by 120k.
                        Upper high input has an input impedance of 1M, no attenuation and grid stopper is 47k//120k.

                        And FWIW, the input impedance of the "standard" low input is 2x68k = 136k as the 1M is shorted.
                        Last edited by Helmholtz; 12-12-2020, 10:24 PM.
                        - Own Opinions Only -

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X