Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reduce gain of 12ax7 to 1
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by catalin gramada; 12-17-2021, 04:59 AM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
Thanks Dave. Yes, that's what I meant. I hadn't posted because I didn't have time to draw it up. But you (conveniently) attached an existing image. Thank you.
catalin gramada, Yes, impedance could be an issue. Or not. That's why I wanted to see more of the circuit.
Impedance can usually be managed with this circuit. A bigger concern (for my consideration) would be reconciling any voltage differential at the switched nodes."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave H View Post
Now, this circuit/wiring wouldn't make a good input stage because of its low input impedance. (It's fine for signal mixing, though.)
Feeding the output voltage back to the inverting input (grid) makes this input a "virtual ground" (aka "zero voltage node").
So the instrument would be loaded essentially by the grid stopper alone.
A gain of 1 with an input impedance of 500k would mean Rf = Rg = 500k.
Another way to look at it is applying the Miller theorem, yielding that the impedance between grid and ground is roughly given by feedback resistor value divided by open loop gain.
Last edited by Helmholtz; 12-17-2021, 02:24 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Agree about the input stage being a bad place to employ this circuit. I was considering the following triode. Ergo my inquiry about more of the circuit."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
One concern with the split plate load would be the quality and condition of the power supply decoupling caps. Too much series resistance could cause noise when signal loading to the HV rail. Especially at the first triode."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostI actually favor the simple switched voltage divider after the first stage (see JMF's example).
I get unnecessarily complicated sometimes. Looking for something that might be the best solution rather than the simplest. My only concern with this method was Johnson noise with series resistance. But in this case any noise generated by additional series resistance is probably no big deal because the goal is reduced stage gain.
"Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck H View PostMy only concern with this method was Johnson noise with series resistance.
The noise voltage across the series resistor gets voltage-divided just like the signal.
Only the equivalent source resistance of the circuit (Thevenin) contributes thermal noise and that is something like 4.6k in JMF's example.
- Own Opinions Only -
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Thanks guys!
you clearly know your stuff.
My amps tend to come together on the bench, so I haven't drawn up the full schematic yet, but the general idea is: 12ax7 input stage - volume - 5879 pentode - 12ax7 cathode follower - tone stack - ltpi - el84 pp output stage, cathode biased.
The 5879 has more gain than the 12ax7 so I expect a lot of overdrive with the volume up.
I will build it first without the switchable attenuation, then I'll try different things and stick with what sounds better.
Thanks again
Comment
-
Originally posted by Henrik View PostThe 5879 has more gain than the 12ax7 so I expect a lot of overdrive with the volume up.
All the data sheets I found for the 5879 tube indicate the triode operated amplification factor (21) but for the pentode only a dash is shown (?). Regardless, it's not 3600."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
For a pentode gain is found from transconductance times total load impedance.
The 5879 datasheet (https://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/079/5/5879.pdf) lists a practical gain of 150.Last edited by Helmholtz; 12-18-2021, 09:56 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
Comment