Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Single Ended Hum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Make it a head ?

    Comment


    • #62
      So this is a newb question:
      I finally got the new PT wired in the Chassis.. I did a Full Bridge Rectifier and powered on for a voltage of around 315vdc.
      I put a 100uf Cap on with 2-100k 2W R's in Series as a Bleeder for a new voltage of 480vdc!
      I suspect adding the rest of the Filtering won't change this voltage or will it?
      Should I calculate a Dropping Resistor right after the Rectifier before the 1st Cap based on the 480vdc?

      269BX.pdf

      Comment


      • #63
        A bridge rectifier used with the transformer you showed and the voltages you listed are perplexing. Could you post a schematic showing how you have everything connected?

        Comment


        • #64
          There's nothing drawing current yet. All I've done so far is built the Rectifier and put a Cap to ground after it.
          Center Tap is not connected to anything.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by leadfootdriver View Post
            There's nothing drawing current yet. All I've done so far is built the Rectifier and put a Cap to ground after it.
            Center Tap is not connected to anything.
            I wanted to see how you connected to which taps on the secondary and the primary.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Tom Phillips View Post
              A bridge rectifier used with the transformer you showed and the voltages you listed are perplexing.
              I think the voltages make sense.
              Unsmoothed average DCV voltage after the bridge must be 10% below PT secondary RMS voltage..

              I assume the new PT to have a secondary voltage around 340V. So with reservoir cap the DCV will be around 480V.
              This might drop by 10% to 20% with load connected.

              Would like to see the PT specs.

              To design in a new PT I strongly recommend to use PSUD2.
              Last edited by Helmholtz; 01-21-2023, 02:30 PM.
              - Own Opinions Only -

              Comment


              • #67
                There's a PDF Link in my post #63

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by leadfootdriver View Post
                  There's a PDF Link in my post #63
                  Ok, spec says no load secondary voltage is 338V which confirms your measurements.
                  - Own Opinions Only -

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post
                    ... confirms your measurements.
                    So I suppose that a bridge rectifier circuit isn't actually being used as stated in the post that started this section of the discussion.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Tom Phillips View Post
                      So I suppose that a bridge rectifier circuit isn't actually being used as stated in the post that started this section of the discussion.
                      How that?
                      It all makes sense with a bridge.
                      - Own Opinions Only -

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post
                        How that? It all makes sense with a bridge.
                        Sorry for my confusion. I mis-read the transformer spec sheet posted. I was thinking that it had a 300V-0-300V secondary but I now understand that it is a 300V center tapped secondary. (150V-0-150V).
                        Cheers,
                        Tom

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          That was with the 115v Mains.. I think I'll switch it to the 125v..

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            SO, I'd like to take advantage of this voltage..
                            I've searched the topic, but maybe hindsight will give a different answer.
                            Any problems running a Fixed Bias, SE EL84 at 400vdc? I have a nice little 5H Choke for the Screens. I read that keeping the Screen Voltage under 300 would be safe. Does this sound the best, or does a closer Plate to Screen Voltage ratio sound best?? Any truth in any of this??

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by leadfootdriver View Post
                              Any problems running a Fixed Bias, SE EL84 at 400vdc? I have a nice little 5H Choke for the Screens. I read that keeping the Screen Voltage under 300 would be safe.
                              Safe? Yes. But you won't be able to take advantage of that voltage anyway. That is, you won't get more output clean and with clipping any increased output just amounts to greater asymmetry. I'm not expert in this but that is my own experience. I vote to stay with the lower voltage option.

                              Maybe Helmholtz will have better news on the matter.
                              "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                              "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                              "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                              You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                I was playing around a bit.. I switched the Mains to 125v. I put an 18k 2-watt after the Rectifier into the 100uf with the 2-100k in series Bleeder across it for 348vdc.
                                The Bleeders are an easy way to bleed off voltage.

                                Click image for larger version  Name:	Adobe Scan Jan 21, 2023 (1)_1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	76.6 KB ID:	976772
                                Last edited by leadfootdriver; 01-22-2023, 02:53 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X