I've just gotten an Alamo Capri ~1966 in for basic repairs and safety mods (this one is the version with no power transformer).
What puzzles me a bit is the 10" Alnico speaker in it. It says "Application Engineered for Alamo Electronics" on a sticker on the back, which would suggest it's original. It's an odd speaker in that has plastic windows on either side of the pole piece through which you can actually see the voice coil, and you can see a LOT of the voice coil. It's a fairly overhung coil, but that's part of what puzzles me. It seems to me that if you have a 2.5W amp, you'd want to have as much of the VC in the gap as possible, not a large percentage of it sitting above and below the gap. So, I started wondering if this speaker had been indifferently reconed, maybe years ago, since some reconers will just stick in something that "works." I've never seen an Alamo amp or the speaker used in it, so I thought I'd post it here to see if anyone could verify whether the speaker looked original or whether it looked reconed. Sorry for the blurriness of the VC photo; it was hard to get my camera to focus on it.
What puzzles me a bit is the 10" Alnico speaker in it. It says "Application Engineered for Alamo Electronics" on a sticker on the back, which would suggest it's original. It's an odd speaker in that has plastic windows on either side of the pole piece through which you can actually see the voice coil, and you can see a LOT of the voice coil. It's a fairly overhung coil, but that's part of what puzzles me. It seems to me that if you have a 2.5W amp, you'd want to have as much of the VC in the gap as possible, not a large percentage of it sitting above and below the gap. So, I started wondering if this speaker had been indifferently reconed, maybe years ago, since some reconers will just stick in something that "works." I've never seen an Alamo amp or the speaker used in it, so I thought I'd post it here to see if anyone could verify whether the speaker looked original or whether it looked reconed. Sorry for the blurriness of the VC photo; it was hard to get my camera to focus on it.
Comment