Looking at my old '59 Fender Champ, I see that the tube sockets were mounted with rubber washers or grommets. The socket is then connected to the chassis with a braided ground wire. I'm wondering if anyone knows, or can infer, the reason for this type of contruction. Is it intended to isolate the tubes from vibration, or is there something else going on?
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vintage Contruction Techniques - Tube Socket Mounting
Collapse
X
-
OK, thanks. So I'll assume that Fender eventually abandoned this technique because they decided it just wasn't worth the time and trouble.
The grounding technique on this amp is... interesting. Ground wires soldered to the chassis scattered all over the place. Notice the wire from the OT secondary goes straight to the OT frame. Surprisingly, the amp is fairly quiet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fletcher Munson View PostOK, thanks. So I'll assume that Fender eventually abandoned this technique because they decided it just wasn't worth the time and trouble.
Originally posted by Fletcher Munson View PostThe grounding technique on this amp is... interesting. Ground wires soldered to the chassis scattered all over the place. Notice the wire from the OT secondary goes straight to the OT frame.
Originally posted by Fletcher Munson View PostSurprisingly, the amp is fairly quiet.
Comment
-
When the boogie-man started hot rodding Fenders the added gain gave microphonic/feedback issues so he re-introduced the rubber grommets at the first preamp tube (at least in the early boogies).
Some Ampegs use rubber standoffs to isolate the entire chassis from the cabinet.Originally posted by EnzoI have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Phillips View PostYes. The technique was actually very short lived. Fender probably just figured out that they could market adequate amps without the additional effort so the vibration isolation[...]It is interesting how old amps sometimes get screwed up when someone tries to improve the grounding scheme by making incremental changes but do not work in concert with the old grounding left in the build. In those cases the individual changes are each better in theory. However, the individual changes may not work well with the old grounding circuits left in place. The point being that a grounding scheme must be designed as an organized system rather than a collection of individual parts.
cheers
Rob
Comment
-
Totally off-topic, but I have another qustion about construction techniques on this amp. Does anyone know what the greenish paint is that they used to seal/mark the nuts? I've seen this sort of thing on 50's electronics before and always assumed it was there as a kind of "loc-tite" and as a visual mark that the joint hadn't been tampered with. Anyone know how and why they did this? Is it just paint, or something else?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fletcher Munson View Post...Does anyone know what the greenish paint is that they used to seal/mark the nuts? I've seen this sort of thing on 50's electronics before and always assumed it was there as a kind of "loc-tite" and as a visual mark that the joint hadn't been tampered with. Anyone know how and why they did this?...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fletcher Munson View PostAnyone know how and why they did this? Is it just paint, or something else?This isn't the future I signed up for.
Comment
-
Here's my take on the reason for dropping the rubber grommet mounting system. When these amps were originally designed, microphonic preamp tubes, especially the octals, were the norm. Adding the shock mounts could make the difference between and amp that was playable and one that constantly howled and whistled.
With the later use of the 7025, there was less need for the isolation so why spend the time and money for something that was no longer needed.
Comment
-
In the 50`s the general purpose adhesive (except for wood) was nitrocellulose and nail enamel is just one version of it.
Anoher name was "speaker cement"
Now you know why those old Jensens are brittle and self disassemble.
Even today I buy a can of the modern version: nitro (if available) or acrylic "car paint base" , the transparent one which fills only 3/4 of the can on purpose, so you can squeeze pigment pouches in as desired.
That allows car painters flexibility in adjusting exact matching colours, even if car is off-colour (old/sun exposure/etc.)
As is, itīs quite liquid, so I let the can open for a couple days until it thickens into syrup or honey , to use as adhesive, including thread lock.
The beauty is that it stands vibration very well, but a little extra pressure with a tool snaps it open, very clean.
Other adhesives gum the threads, these do not.
In fact I save "honey"/daughter empty nail enamel bottles and fill them with nitro paint, to touch up scratches, screw heads, rust spots, etc. ,very handy.Juan Manuel Fahey
Comment
-
According to Wikipedia:
Thread-locking fluid was developed by American professor Vernon K. Krieble in 1953. His company, American Sealants, founded the Loctite brand. An early version of the compound was patented in 1960.
I didn't know Loctite had been around that long. The material on the amp could be a thinned paint, but it might just be Loctite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread-locking_fluid
Comment
-
I think they were doping solder joints before 1953, I certainly burnt through my share of the stuff desoldering parts from WW2 surplus gear when I was a kid. And of course hardware too.
In my shop I had a spiffy bottle of neon pink nail polish for doping nuts and screws. One cheap bottle from the dime store lasted ages.
DIme store was the 1950s equivalent of the dollar stores of today.Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.
Comment
Comment