Q1 base was pulsing fast at 3.98vdc before R8 & R9 beging to overheat.
The positive rail was fine but the negative look to have a hard time to raise and was around 35v when i shot it off.
So the shotdown ballancer appear to work by trying to load the positive side via R8 & R9.
Before testing the whole thing with a variac, i wanna try something;
Why not remove the voltage multiplier and the shotdown voltage ballancer to leave only the linear component for the +/- 65 volts rails.
This should make simple basic operational test.
I removed all the components in the red boxes.
Then i end up with a +75vdc / -78 vdc...
Only the transformer give me 48.3vac / ct / 48.3vac and 96vac end to end.
If i add the bridge i have +70vdc / CT / -70vdc and 140vdc +to- with 0.02vac.
So +75vdc / -78vdc from the basic bridge/filter circuit, what can cause this imballance and is it of any significance ?
If so, it should be corrected at this level, before implementing the ballance of the circuits ?
The positive rail was fine but the negative look to have a hard time to raise and was around 35v when i shot it off.
So the shotdown ballancer appear to work by trying to load the positive side via R8 & R9.
Before testing the whole thing with a variac, i wanna try something;
Why not remove the voltage multiplier and the shotdown voltage ballancer to leave only the linear component for the +/- 65 volts rails.
This should make simple basic operational test.
I removed all the components in the red boxes.
Then i end up with a +75vdc / -78 vdc...
Only the transformer give me 48.3vac / ct / 48.3vac and 96vac end to end.
If i add the bridge i have +70vdc / CT / -70vdc and 140vdc +to- with 0.02vac.
So +75vdc / -78vdc from the basic bridge/filter circuit, what can cause this imballance and is it of any significance ?
If so, it should be corrected at this level, before implementing the ballance of the circuits ?
Comment