Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fender Sliverface Musicmaster Bass Amp

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fender Sliverface Musicmaster Bass Amp

    i just bought an all original musicmaster bass amp from the 1970's. im not sure when it was made. i dont really know anyting about it. if anyone has any info at all please let me know.

  • #2
    i forgot to mention this amp has 1-12" speaker and 2-6AQ5A tubes and 1-12AT7 tube.

    Comment


    • #3
      check out this website

      http://www.ampwares.com/ffg/
      scroll on the left and find the music master bass. you can get a more definate year by looking at different parts inside for dates ie. transformer, pots, and so forth. There is a schematic on the music master page.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hey NR,

        Not sure what you want to know about this amp - in this day of kilowatt bass amps you might find it just a tad 'under powered" <grin>. And, as best I remember, it's the only Fender design with a transformer PI that was produced. While not spectacular as a bass amp this little thang makes a nice small guitar amp with a speaker change. But if you're a bass player perhaps the best use of the amp - in good condition - is to pass it on to a Fender collector and use the $$ to build (or buy) a bass amp more suitable for stage/practice. Other lower wattage bass amps - such as the Ampeg "B" series ("fliptops") - are "holy grail" for studio use but these small Fenders don't seem to have caught on in the studio.

        Rob

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes, I remember seeing one of these in a local junk shop and ROFL. Even in the 70s Fender had a lot of nerve calling it a bass amp. It has an open backed cabinet, too. The Ampeg fliptops have a ported cabinet that gives them half a chance of actually reproducing bass, not to mention being three times the power of this thing.

          The guy wanted $100 for it, the 6V6s had been replaced with EL34s, and the sticker said "Needs attention", so I reckoned there was a fair chance the tube swap had burnt out the transformers and passed on it.

          The Fender 300PS and 400PS also had transformer PIs, and were much more suitable as bass amps
          Last edited by Steve Conner; 01-23-2007, 02:19 PM.
          "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

          Comment


          • #6
            i do in fact use this amp for bass and i think it sounds just fine for what i use it for. i do wish it would get just a little bit louder tho. do you know if there is anything i can do to make the amp louder (new/different tubes, mods....)??

            Comment


            • #7
              You could swap it for a 300PS with the W bin cabinet, it'll sound like a whole new amp

              Seriously, loudness is probably about the hardest thing to change about an amp. Once you've turned all the knobs up full and overdriven it to as much dirt as you can stand, all you can do is replace the speaker for a more efficient one, and/or replace the whole power section as well as both transformers.

              Because of the way ears work, it takes about a 10 fold increase in power to make a noticeable difference in loudness, so that would mean gutting the amp and rebuilding.

              You could always try sealing the back of the cabinet to let the bass resonate more, but watch that the tubes don't overheat.
              "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

              Comment


              • #8
                That wasn't a bad little practice amp. I remember playing through one in the music store lesson booth back in the 1970s when I was taking lessons.

                If you need more volume, the most effective way to effect a volume change is to swap to a speaker of higher efficiency. If you've got an inefficient speaker in there, a more efficient speaker could make a significant difference. It still wouldn't convert it into a stage amp though. The amp will always be a little amp.
                "Stand back, I'm holding a calculator." - chinrest

                "I happen to have an original 1955 Stratocaster! The neck and body have been replaced with top quality Warmoth parts, I upgraded the hardware and put in custom, hand wound pickups. It's fabulous. There's nothing like that vintage tone or owning an original." - Chuck H

                Comment


                • #9
                  Even the cab is great for a Champ/VibroChamp chassis.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    it has the original speaker in it. a jensen i believe...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I've got one of these and Yea, i remember the speaker being kind of 'farty' sounding. It's my favorite studio and practice amp of all time. Much bigger and better sound than a Champ.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I just repaired one and did a cap job that was deserately in need of. We replaced the speaker with a higher wattage as the magnet of the original is very small and light-weight. A larger speaker will help the volume situation but IMHO this amp is a guitar amp. Sounds better with a guitar thru it and performs better with a guitar. Take the advice of the above posters. Want a Bass amp get a Bass AMP. IMO this is a guitar amp !, and a very nice sounding one at that.
                        KB

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi Nizzrooster:

                          Nothing to add directly about the amp but I had a Gibson GA-5 (Crestline) that ran on 6AQ5s. I replaced the as-bought set with NOS 6AQ5s; maybe didn't stay with them long enough to let them break in but went to a pair of NOS 6005s, a direct substitute for the 6AQ5; a little softer and sweeter tone.

                          Get a fresh(er) speaker; 25-30 watts max. Finally, consider being nice to the amp and replacing the speaker feeds with 'stereophile' type OFHC #14 wire; no point in killing yourself to clean up the amp then listen to it through a tinny little set of cheesy wires. Good luck.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, better rewind the output transformer secondary with #14 OFC while you're at it too; after all, the current has to pass through all that cheap, cheesy magnet wire before it even gets to the speaker leads. What do you mean you can't get #14 to fit?

                            IMO, just about anything will do for a speaker lead. Just don't use the cord from a vacuum cleaner, it will make your tone suck
                            "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              You're right about the transformer winding but if wire doesn't matter, why does the 'stereo crowd' go through so much trouble with their speaker wiring?

                              The several times I've upgraded speaker drops, I've gotten a little more width and depth in the output; not as dramatic as a newer, fresher speaker but noticeable.

                              I always wonder what older amps would have sounded like had cost not been a consideration in their manufacture. Given the choice between the #18 or #20 and #14, I wonder what they would have used.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X