Originally posted by nisios
View Post
Echolette NG51 Tape Loop Echo | ReVamp Blog
Secondly Nisios thanks for your interpretation/opinion re the tunable capacitors it's starting to sink in ! :-)
Nisios re the hum , on the UK site Echolette NG51 Tape Loop Echo | ReVamp Blog
down the bottom he mentions this
On this last pic you’ll see a heavy twisted black and white cable. There’s a good reason for this, but you can improve matter just by tightening down bolts. The transformer is bolted to the main chassis and the main earth (ground) is connected to that. As the heaters have a centre tap to ground (via hum balance ) any problems with the chassis connection between the transformer (that’s the big brown thing on the left of the pic, with wires all over it) is big bad news for hum and background noise. The heavy black/white cable actually straps the main and the sub chasis’s together, so the electrical connection of the frames isn’t really important. If that’s not done, slacken the screws off to the transformer chasis, and then tighten them down again. It will shift any claggy accumulations and refresh the ground connection.
This could be stopping the hum pot from "fine tuning the hum out" !!
And A.T. I was referring to the older Echolette so I'll get on the E-51... the right page now with the attached.
It appears Dynacord took over and redrew the schematic.. it seems almost identical ,well apart from the jacks !
R73/R72/R71 are the pre-sets see the attached.
Dunno why I thought a variable capacitor had a slug !
It appears all those "varicaps" are 150pF and the other values are ones the 150pF's are adjusted to.
What I thought was an AC sign is in fact a tilde ~ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
" in mathematics the tilde mark used to indicate an approximate value"
Having 3 record heads that simultaneously record on to the tape I find a bit hard to get my head around !
The capacitance values appear to be multiples (i.e. freq doubling ?) I'm missing something.. perhaps it's my brain...!
What I am wondering is why they have to be set at different values. and suggesting maybe to do with the sound on sound approach..
Comment