I've just repaired a couple of these DE1 pedals for a friend; he liked the first so much he bought another when the first one died.
In both cases IC4, an RC4558 dual opamp had failed.
See attached schematic that luckily an internet search picked up; amazingly, 'Basoni' must have reverse engineered and drawn up very professionally. It seems accurate.
IC4A amplifies the already buffered input about 10dB and sends it off to the main chip etc, IC4B mixes the wet and dry signals and sends them off to the output.
Weirdly (to me) the output is loaded with 470R R201.
With one unit, IC4B only had failed, with the other both sections were dead.
Fixed, they do sound good!
Is there a design flaw? If so any thoughts on how to make them more resilient?
All I can think is ESD, and maybe add a small series resistor (eg 100R) and couple of series pairs of back to back diode clippers across the output.
In both cases IC4, an RC4558 dual opamp had failed.
See attached schematic that luckily an internet search picked up; amazingly, 'Basoni' must have reverse engineered and drawn up very professionally. It seems accurate.
IC4A amplifies the already buffered input about 10dB and sends it off to the main chip etc, IC4B mixes the wet and dry signals and sends them off to the output.
Weirdly (to me) the output is loaded with 470R R201.
With one unit, IC4B only had failed, with the other both sections were dead.
Fixed, they do sound good!
Is there a design flaw? If so any thoughts on how to make them more resilient?
All I can think is ESD, and maybe add a small series resistor (eg 100R) and couple of series pairs of back to back diode clippers across the output.
Comment