I've always thought the Vox circuit was a bit more usable than the Fuzz Face in a band environment [not as "woofy" and bass-heavy]. I'm messing around with some low-gain silicon transistors and will probably make a 3-transistor Tonebender as well. The low hfe trannys seem to sound better.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vox Tonebender vs Fuzz Face Circuit and low gain transistors
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by vintagekiki View PostTonebender (attachment) uses germanium transistors (SFT, AC, OC), which in themselves have a modest hfe.
Low (modest) hfe, the transistor later comes into saturation and the sound is better.
Comment
-
https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=30600
Vox - V816 Distortion Booster: GE an SI versions
Look at these two links. You will not be disappointed.
https://www.freestompboxes.org/index.php
https://stompboxes.co.uk/forum/index.php
You must log in or sign upIt's All Over Now
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by vintagekiki View Posthttps://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=30600
Vox - V816 Distortion Booster: GE an SI versions
Look at these two links. You will not be disappointed.
https://www.freestompboxes.org/index.php
https://stompboxes.co.uk/forum/index.php
You must log in or sign up
- Likes 1
Comment
-
https://www.electrosmash.com/fuzz-face
Fuzz Face Analysis
https://www.electrosmash.com/germanium-fuzz
You Can Build the Perfect Germanium Fuzz
https://fuzzcentral.ssguitar.com/schematics.php
http://www.kitrae.net/music/music_big_muff.html 1)
http://www.geofex.com/article_folders/fuzzface/fffram.htm 2)
The Technology of the Fuzz Face
It's All Over Now
- Likes 1
Comment
-
http://www.voxshowroom.com/us/misc/v810.html
Vox V810 Bass Booster
http://www.voxshowroom.com/us/misc/v806.html
Vox V806 Treble Booster
https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=30597
Vox - Deluxe Distortion Booster V8162
It's All Over Now
Comment
-
In the beginning, pedals mostly used universal purpose semiconductors so-called TUP and TUN transistors.
These are low or medium gain transistors (BC107, BC108, BC182, BC183) and these pedals are still unsurpassed today, they have that recognizable vintage sound.
Analyze vintage schematics, you will notice that there was not much philosophizing about biasing, technological solutions, only 2-3 transistors a few resistors and capacitors and you get a lot of sound.
https://worldradiohistory.com/UK/Elektor/70s/Elektor-1977-07-08.pdf
tup-tun-dug-dus (page from 7-79 ...)
https://www.histo.cat/e/TUP-TUN-transistors-DUG-DUN-diodes-PNP-NPNIt's All Over Now
Comment
-
This is a great circuit and a good first project if anyone is looking for one due to the low parts count . I've built a few of them . I take a different approach than most , instead of scouring the planet for obsolete transistors I believe that whatever is in that old radio over there will work . I've built one with PN2222 which is probably the most ordinary transistor on earth . I adjust the Cs and Rs to make it work . Aim for about 1/2 supply on Q2 collector and adjust the feedback resistor for best fuzz . As simple as this circuit seems its surprisingly complex , due to the feedback . You would think gain would not matter , more gain means more feedback which means less gain , however it seems device gain does make a difference . I have no idea why . Anyone have any explanation ? Also the output impedance is not what you would expect and its hard to take measurements at the base of Q1 .
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by 35L6 View PostThis is a great circuit and a good first project if anyone is looking for one due to the low parts count . I've built a few of them . I take a different approach than most , instead of scouring the planet for obsolete transistors I believe that whatever is in that old radio over there will work . I've built one with PN2222 which is probably the most ordinary transistor on earth . I adjust the Cs and Rs to make it work . Aim for about 1/2 supply on Q2 collector and adjust the feedback resistor for best fuzz . As simple as this circuit seems its surprisingly complex , due to the feedback . You would think gain would not matter , more gain means more feedback which means less gain , however it seems device gain does make a difference . I have no idea why . Anyone have any explanation ? Also the output impedance is not what you would expect and its hard to take measurements at the base of Q1 .
Comment
-
Does it put out a good sine wave ? In my current facebender adventue , I've tried a couple things . I put in a 47K series resister and low value cap on the input to raise the input impedance and not load down the source and lose highs . It cut the input level to much and seemed to raise the Miller capacitance and create the very problem it was supposed to cure . I paralleled the cap and jumpered the resistor . The other thing I did was add a tilt control to the output ( aka BMP ) . That worked out better but I think it could be improved . I used Duncans tone stack calculator to model it which was only so accurate since I don't know the output impedance or just what corner frequency I want anyway . I wonder if choosing just the right input and output caps would work as good or better than more complicated solutions .
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by 35L6 View PostDoes it put out a good sine wave ? In my current facebender adventue , I've tried a couple things . I put in a 47K series resister and low value cap on the input to raise the input impedance and not load down the source and lose highs . It cut the input level to much and seemed to raise the Miller capacitance and create the very problem it was supposed to cure . I paralleled the cap and jumpered the resistor . The other thing I did was add a tilt control to the output ( aka BMP ) . That worked out better but I think it could be improved . I used Duncans tone stack calculator to model it which was only so accurate since I don't know the output impedance or just what corner frequency I want anyway . I wonder if choosing just the right input and output caps would work as good or better than more complicated solutions .
Comment
Comment