Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newbie question on steel (a bit long post)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Newbie question on steel (a bit long post)

    Hi Guys, I’m a newbie here - I’ve been reading posts from most of the pages (48 all in all).
    A short presentation of me would be that I’m 54 years old; I’ve been playing since I was eleven. For a while there I thought I would be the new EC - which didn’t happen and I’m glad I did not try harder (but it did affect my grades in school a lot). I’m still playing in a band and love every minute of it.
    I’ve played many of the “originals” and have friends that own guitars from the late 50: ies. I would say I know good tone.
    I’m playing Gibson’s mostly and currently play a beautiful LP ’58 RI through a BF Deluxe Reverb or a Tweed Deluxe.
    I’ve owned and played many designers PU:s (Lollar, Wolfe, Lundgren (a Swede), SD, DMZio, Gibsons, Tim White) but never really reached the same level of tonal satisfaction as I did with a pair of early T-tops that I sold many years ago #( (or maybe it's just age

    I’ve read and learned a lot here. I liked Dave’s tone on Youtube a lot. So, I ordered a pair from him (haven’t got them yet though .

    Many posts here concerns the magnet wire but Dave talks a lot about, and always returns to, the steel/iron content in the PU - and this is my question. I do not expect you guys to give away trade secrets but a short introduction to the subject would be nice.
    What is soft steel? I believe that is the term Seth Lover used. What is the difference between iron and steel? Who uses 1022 steel and who uses 1018? What’s the tonal difference between those two? Is there any other kind of steel that has favourable tonal properties?
    If I take the iron nails that I saved from my old house (built 1905) and put them in a PAF replica – would they sound good?

    (One of the best post on this subject was http://music-electronics-forum.com/s...highlight=1022 But I’m still not much wiser after reading that).

    Bjorn Larsson
    Sweden

  • #2
    Most of the time people talk about "soft iron" which is (I believe) a term from the 1930's to 1960's. I dont believe that is even a set definition of that term. Generally it refers to a low carbon steel of the cold rolled variety. There are really only a few options in the bracket today.. 1018 and 1022 are readily available in bar stock. It is possible to get other alloys, but not in a form that is usable to a pickup maker.

    My current theory is that during WWII there were many different options for steel available, and now it is just not nessesary as 1018 and 1022 function for most everything.

    The reason the variety of steel is important is that every part of conductive metal in the pickup changes the load on the magnet, which alters the tone. The more conductive metal, the more load on the magnet. I don't have a lot of experience in pickup winding, but from what I have read the differences between 1018 and 1022 are noticable, but not major. I personally would think that the size/shape of the parts would make more of a difference... In theory.

    b.

    Comment


    • #3
      ....

      Hang in there Bjorn, they're coming eventually :-) Making progress.....

      From what I found, steel before 1968 was made in open hearth furnaces and had a peculiar chemcial content because of that. That kind of steel is no longer made. Thats all I'll say about that. Steels are like magnets, they will sound different depending on where and who made them. 1018 is the most common alloy these days, 1022 is real hard to find anywhere unless you have a good mill connection and you have to buy alot to get it. "Soft iron" was just a loose term back then meaning exactly that. PAF period soft iron has no direct replacement in modern times.

      With different steels you just have to try them out and see how they sound in a pickup. I thought you could use an lCR meter to get a handle on that but alot of what happens is in the upper frequencies where the meter can't see. Steel is a huge subject, I've spent hours online googling and reading as much as I could understand; there are scores of kinds of steel you can try, it gets real confusing because there are about four different naming systems as to whats in the alloy. Its really been helpful to me to buy a small lathe and mill to make the parts myself, a good skill to have.
      http://www.SDpickups.com
      Stephens Design Pickups

      Comment


      • #4
        Hey Dave, do you have any experience with "oil-hardening" O1 tool steel?

        (0.90% carbon, 1.0%-1.4% manganese, 0.50% chrome, 0.50% nickel, and 0.50% tungsten.)

        I picked up some because there was a 3 week wait on 1018.
        It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


        http://coneyislandguitars.com
        www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you for replying.
          So - I guess my “soft” iron nails from 1905 could be a good substrate to make PU parts from 

          Are most PU:s coming from bigger manufacturers (read SD, DMZio) made of 1018 steel, (because that’s the steel that’s available)?

          What are the tonal differences between 1018 steel and 1022? I know I read it somewhere but I can’t seem to find where.

          Comment


          • #6
            ...

            Yeah iron nails from then would be great. I don't know what DM or Duncan use and they won't tell you for sure. 1018 is generally a bit darker and looser feel than 1022. 1022 can be real hard edged sometimes. But it all depends on what the other parts are made of as well, its a big jig saw puzzle....
            http://www.SDpickups.com
            Stephens Design Pickups

            Comment


            • #7
              Those iron nails, whether cut nails (90% post-1840/50) or actual forged (that would be pretty rare for 1905, at least here in US), are relatively low-quality iron which means they will have a high proportion of silicate/slag inclusions. Also, rust/corrosion has a way of working itself into these inclusions (think of them as veins or fibers in the metal) so that while you may cut and/or machine a piece down which looks clean, it may possess rust pockets or rusty 'threads' inside. I have no idea how this would effect the transference of magnetism from the magnet. Certainly worth a try but anything made from them will be a far cry from either electrical grade iron (which is beautiful but costs a fortune) or relatively 'clean' plain low carbon steel in the 1002-1010 range which you'll have to machine yourself.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                Hey Dave, do you have any experience with "oil-hardening" O1 tool steel?

                (0.90% carbon, 1.0%-1.4% manganese, 0.50% chrome, 0.50% nickel, and 0.50% tungsten.)

                I picked up some because there was a 3 week wait on 1018.
                To harden steel heat it until it is orange and no longer magnetic. Then plunge it into whatever cooling method is best for that steel (oil, water, room tremperature air). This will convert the austenitic steel to a full martensitic state. You don't want that...it's too brittle. You'll want to temper it back in an over at 350-425*f for aprox 30 minutes. The best way to determine when it is at the right temp is to clean up the metal before tempering and look for it to change to a straw brown color...(figuring fairly well tempered...light straw color for something like a knife). Ideally, placing the parts in hot ashes (aprox same temp as part) and allowing to cool from there very slowly...for what you are doing just leaving them in the oven and allowing it to cool slowly should do.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't want to actually harden it... I'm using it for pickup blades. I wanted to go with a lower carbon steel, but there was a long wait from McMaster-Carr, and I wanted to have something to work with, so I ordered a meter of the stuff.

                  I just haven't made it into a pickup yet.
                  It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                  http://coneyislandguitars.com
                  www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ...

                    David, I got some to try for a hoot. Probably won't be very good, I think its about 100 parts carbon, five times higher than 1022. But I'll try anything once....
                    http://www.SDpickups.com
                    Stephens Design Pickups

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's 0.90% carbon. 1022 is Carbon 0.18 - 0.23%.

                      What do you hear in the higher carbon steels that you don't like? Is it harsher?

                      Of course this is for a bass pickup, and with neo magnets...

                      I'll be trying it out soon. I don't even know what I've been using with the latest pickup parts.
                      It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                      http://coneyislandguitars.com
                      www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        ....

                        Judging by the 1022 screws I had made (not an acid test admittedly) and some 1022 slugs I've tried they are just to hard sounding, no sag, kinda flat harsh if that makes any sense. But I guess it depends on what and how you're using it. 90pts carbon is awful high...
                        http://www.SDpickups.com
                        Stephens Design Pickups

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well I'll find out soon enough. Ironically I could have waited for the cold rolled steel bar.

                          I figured that the allen screws used in a lot of pickups are alloy steel which is harder than the low carbon stuff.
                          It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                          http://coneyislandguitars.com
                          www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ...

                            the stuff I got is W-1, its a bit higher carbon....
                            http://www.SDpickups.com
                            Stephens Design Pickups

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                              I figured that the allen screws used in a lot of pickups are alloy steel which is harder than the low carbon stuff.
                              Typically, the screw material will be something like 1045 "medium" steel, being 0.45% carbon.

                              Allen wrenches are made of steels such as 8650 chrome nickel alloy, at least the good ones are.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X