Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Any interest for P51 (T51), P57 or J60 bass pickup schematics?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Any interest for P51 (T51), P57 or J60 bass pickup schematics?

    From what I've been able to gather from the 10 or so pages' worth of threads there's plenty of talk about both bass and guitar pickups - the former makes me, as a bassist, very happy as the place is a treasure mine.

    However, one of the things I see that are somewhat lacking are the schematics for the three most common pickup form factors that we've all grown to love - or at least tolerate because they're so common:
    • the '51 Precision, or '51 Tele-bass (as I usually denote it, T51)
    • the '57 Precision (written above as P57)
    • the '60s Jazz pickup (again, as above, J60)


    Now, I'm not here to ask for help yet - instead, if there's enough interest (and I haven't seen the schematics stickied anywhere) I'm willing to post PDFs containing multiviews (top, side, front) of the above three pickups with all the neccessary dimensions. The models depicted would be are all standard (that is, Tele pickups have one pole underneath the strings, P/Js have two poles surrounding the string).

    Thoughts?
    Pickup prototype checklist: [x] FR4 [x] Cu AWG 42 [x] Neo magnets [x] Willpower [ ] Time - Winding suspended due to exams.

    Originally posted by David Schwab
    Then you have neos... which is a fuzzy bunny wrapped in barbed wire.

  • #2
    Stealth,
    A "schematic" usually denotes a wiring diagram, not a dimensioned technical drawing.

    Are you taking these measurements yourself off of actual era pickups you own? If so that would be useful to some I'm sure.

    Documenting your process for the measurements will lend credibility to the whole effort.

    We tend to have a healthy disregard for measurements taken from modern "exact replicas" sold by various manufacturers.

    Original Fender documents of the era would be interesting from a historical perspective but might not actually represent what was coming out of the factory at the time.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by David King View Post
      We tend to have a healthy disregard for measurements taken from modern "exact replicas" sold by various manufacturers.
      Yeah, do they not have a real sample to model off of, or they just don't care? I think the latter is the case with some of Fender's repro pickups, like the Jazzmasters.

      There's a story that Gibson wanted to reproduce a vintage Les Paul, but didn't have a real guitar to work from, so they went off of a photograph! My friend has one of them, and the lines are not right at all.
      It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


      http://coneyislandguitars.com
      www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
        There's a story that Gibson wanted to reproduce a vintage Les Paul, but didn't have a real guitar to work from, so they went off of a photograph! My friend has one of them, and the lines are not right at all.
        I find this a bit hard to believe...
        Pepe aka Lt. Kojak
        Milano, Italy

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by LtKojak View Post
          I find this a bit hard to believe...
          This was when they were going from the Norlin pancake bodies with the crappy neck tenon, and wanted to get them more like the vintage guitars.

          But all the old forms and stuff were long gone.

          I also find it hard to believe that they couldn't borrow a guitar from somewhere, but my buddy is quite the LP expert, and has about 15 of them, mostly from the 80's and 90's. The model in question is quite obvious when placed next to earlier and later models.
          It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


          http://coneyislandguitars.com
          www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Stealth View Post
            From what I've been able to gather from the 10 or so pages' worth of threads there's plenty of talk about both bass and guitar pickups - the former makes me, as a bassist, very happy as the place is a treasure mine.

            However, one of the things I see that are somewhat lacking are the schematics for the three most common pickup form factors that we've all grown to love - or at least tolerate because they're so common:
            • the '51 Precision, or '51 Tele-bass (as I usually denote it, T51)
            • the '57 Precision (written above as P57)
            • the '60s Jazz pickup (again, as above, J60)


            Now, I'm not here to ask for help yet - instead, if there's enough interest (and I haven't seen the schematics stickied anywhere) I'm willing to post PDFs containing multiviews (top, side, front) of the above three pickups with all the neccessary dimensions. The models depicted would be are all standard (that is, Tele pickups have one pole underneath the strings, P/Js have two poles surrounding the string).

            Thoughts?
            Sure, lets see 'em!
            -Brad

            ClassicAmplification.com

            Comment


            • #7
              ....

              I'd like to see them, but what are they taken from? Actual measurements of vintage pickups or just modern generic ones? Almost all the reissue pickups seem to be done wrong these days.

              Here's a pdf of an unusual bass set of pickups I saw on Ebay, I have no idea if this was the norm or just one variant during a certain period of time
              http://www.SDpickups.com
              Stephens Design Pickups

              Comment


              • #8
                ...

                Crap, this thing works or it doesn't let me try it again....
                Oh I see it won't take pdfs.....ok jpeg..
                Attached Files
                http://www.SDpickups.com
                Stephens Design Pickups

                Comment


                • #9
                  You can attach PDFs... I've done it before.
                  It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                  http://coneyislandguitars.com
                  www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'd like to see them too. But, as above, I'd like to know whether the measurements are from real 50's and 60's pickups or the current crop of reissues.
                    int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                    www.ozbassforum.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      How much of this is genuine I dont know, but back in the 80s I was talking to the guys from Heritage and their take on things was when they took over the factory Gibson thought That was it, but then found they had sold everything there including the old jigs and had to come up with something fast like drawing round an existing guitar. Iv'e found a couple of 81s with Richard Schneiders initials in the truss rod opening and the shape was a pencil thickness or more bigger especially round the bottom horn. Could have been Heritage sales pitch, not that it was needed as their dot neck outshone the one on the Gibson stand by a mile.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by jonson View Post
                        How much of this is genuine I dont know, but back in the 80s I was talking to the guys from Heritage and their take on things was when they took over the factory Gibson thought That was it, but then found they had sold everything there including the old jigs and had to come up with something fast like drawing round an existing guitar.
                        That's pretty much the story I heard too.

                        The one LP my friend has is really weird looking. The body doesn't have a nice smooth transition into the waste. It's a funny curve. The story of that model is it was done from a photograph, so the perspective was a bit off.

                        I'll ask him for the details.
                        It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                        http://coneyislandguitars.com
                        www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Did we scare Stealth off with our fussy requirements? I suppose we'll have to dig up all the goods ourselves now.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            got wierd after that David. Brit Fender liason officer(strange title) told me that the trucks even turned up to cart it all away and were then turned away themselves. Now surely the most dumbest corporate lawyer would have seen that coming. Had another Paul in a local shop at the time where the body looked like the jigs had slipped and the whole thing was banana shaped with the neck coming off at a strange angle. Should never have got out of quality control and once the Brit importer heard, they came and ripped it off the wall and replaced it quick. Like to have it now. In the past year before that company was lost to Gibson I have been offered hundreds of Pauls etc with warped necks and busted truss rods etc at a price. . How did they get out.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by jonson View Post
                              got wierd after that David. Brit Fender liason officer(strange title) told me that the trucks even turned up to cart it all away and were then turned away themselves. Now surely the most dumbest corporate lawyer would have seen that coming. Had another Paul in a local shop at the time where the body looked like the jigs had slipped and the whole thing was banana shaped with the neck coming off at a strange angle. Should never have got out of quality control and once the Brit importer heard, they came and ripped it off the wall and replaced it quick. Like to have it now. In the past year before that company was lost to Gibson I have been offered hundreds of Pauls etc with warped necks and busted truss rods etc at a price. . How did they get out.
                              And this has WHAT? to do with the pickups mentioned in this thread?
                              -Brad

                              ClassicAmplification.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X