Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gibson Ripper Pickup Measurements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gibson Ripper Pickup Measurements

    Someone walked into my shop with an old beat up Gibson Ripper bass yesterday. Probably 1970's. I now make a habit of measuring everything that comes my way. So without further ado, here are some measurements from the Gibson Ripper Pickups.

    Bridge Pickup:

    Resistance to DC Current:
    Total DCR: 6.25kohms
    First Coil DCR (Black Wire Coil): 3.138
    Second Coil DCR (Red Wire Coil): 3.106

    Magnets:
    Pole Screws read north
    Pole 1: 598 gauss
    Pole 2: 598 gauss
    Pole 3: 600 gauss
    Pole 4: 600-700 Gauss
    Outside of the pickup, on the side of the plastic case: 400-580 Gauss, south pole.

    Inductance/Capacitance/Q/D:
    These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "SER" setting.
    Inductance @ 120hz: 2.400H
    Capacitance @ 120hz: 700nf (0.7uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .293
    Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.397
    Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.234H
    Capacitance @ 1000hz: 11.317nf (0.011uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.86
    Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5499

    These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "PAL" setting.
    Inductance @ 120hz: 30.2H
    Capacitance @ 120hz: No Reading
    Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .293
    Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.406
    Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.88H
    Capacitance @ 1000hz: 8.68nf (0.0086uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.848
    Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5412

    Resistance to AC current:
    AC Resistance @ 120hz: 6.297KOhms
    AC Resistance @ 1000hz: 7.474KOhms

    Resonance Peak: 12.18 khz @ 0.76v

    Signifigant figures were not used, these are direct readings only.


    Neck Pickup:

    Resistance to DC Current:
    Total DCR: 6.35kohms
    First Coil DCR (Black Wire Coil): 3.13
    Second Coil DCR (Red Wire Coil): 3.215

    Magnets:
    Pole Screws read north
    Pole 1: 380 gauss
    Pole 2: 350 gauss
    Pole 3: 311 gauss
    Pole 4: 340 Gauss
    Outside of the pickup, on the side of the plastic case: 275-400 Gauss, south pole.

    Inductance/Capacitance/Q/D:
    These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "SER" setting.
    Inductance @ 120hz: 2.462H
    Capacitance @ 120hz: 682.8nf (0.68uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .2958
    Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.38
    Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.291H
    Capacitance @ 1000hz: 11.037nf (0.011uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.854
    Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5478

    These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "PAL" setting.
    Inductance @ 120hz: 30.63H
    Capacitance @ 120hz: No Reading
    Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .2953
    Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.386
    Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.957H
    Capacitance @ 1000hz: 8.486nf (0.008uf)
    Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.855
    Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5387

    Resistance to AC current:
    AC Resistance @ 120hz: 6.43Kohms
    AC Resistance @ 1000hz: 7.634

    Resonance Peak: 12.37 khz @ 0.78v

    Signifigant figures were not used, these are direct readings only.

  • #2
    Bad memories...

    When I was young, a friend of mine got one of those... it sucked the big one and then some... worst sound on a bass ever! At least that's what I thought thirty years ago.

    Maybe it's really not that bad, but I don't think I'd like to relive that frightening experience again, not even after thirty years! That bass was the cause of breaking up our friendship...

    Bad, bad memories...
    Pepe aka Lt. Kojak
    Milano, Italy

    Comment


    • #3
      I've posted a thanks there solely for the effort you've put in to document the pickups and the historical significance.

      It's interesting in it's own right but I can't help wondering if it's a little bit over the top...

      Can I see the calibration charts for your measuring equipment now?

      - I'm not looking for a flame thing, nor being overly sarky, just a bit worse for wear and I apologise in advance.

      Rob. (bedtime here)

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by LtKojak View Post
        When I was young, a friend of mine got one of those... it sucked the big one and then some... worst sound on a bass ever! At least that's what I thought thirty years ago.

        Maybe it's really not that bad, but I don't think I'd like to relive that frightening experience again, not even after thirty years! That bass was the cause of breaking up our friendship...

        Bad, bad memories...
        Maybe your friend couldn't get a good sound from a bass?

        On a whole, Gibson never made great basses, but I can point you to some players back in the day that got a great tone from Rippers ....



        Last edited by David Schwab; 12-04-2009, 12:46 PM.
        It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


        http://coneyislandguitars.com
        www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Sock Puppet View Post
          I've posted a thanks there solely for the effort you've put in to document the pickups and the historical significance.

          It's interesting in it's own right but I can't help wondering if it's a little bit over the top...

          Can I see the calibration charts for your measuring equipment now?

          - I'm not looking for a flame thing, nor being overly sarky, just a bit worse for wear and I apologise in advance.

          Rob. (bedtime here)
          eh, i love snark :>

          It took me all of 10 minutes to do, so no big deal. I know someday, someone is going to want that info. I'm an information whore. I made a cut and paste sheet which I just type in the info as im measuring it. My meter shows everything on my computer screen so I dont even have to look down.

          I hate looking down. The whole thing smacks of effort.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
            Maybe your friend couldn't get a good sound from a bass?
            Of course not! That was the whole point!

            Bad, bad, REALLY BAD memories...
            Pepe aka Lt. Kojak
            Milano, Italy

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by LtKojak View Post
              Of course not! That was the whole point!

              Bad, bad, REALLY BAD memories...
              But it's really not an awful bass. Maybe he was using the series out-of-phase setting! I have no idea why that was there. It's hardly useable. They should have had a position with the neck pickup instead.

              The Gibson Victory bass was quite interesting too. I almost bought one a couple of years ago.
              It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


              http://coneyislandguitars.com
              www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

              Comment


              • #8
                That Victory is really an excellent bass, as well as the despised RD Artist. Damn, that one sounds and plays excellent--I've been trying to buy my friend's for years now.


                As for the Ripper, anything good enough for Peter Cetera is good enough for me (lol).

                Comment


                • #9
                  I used a Victory on a session in 86 and was quite surprised that I liked the sound which worked quite well for hard rock piece. I was a Fender precision bass man at the time.
                  int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                  www.ozbassforum.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Victory was supposed to sound and feel good to a Fender P player. I think Lee Sklar had them do the small mandolin sized frets.

                    I'm really sorry I didn't grab the one I saw in a local music store. My wife actually pointed it out to me. She doesn't know one bass from another, but they thought it was nice and sleek looking. She thought maybe I could show her how to play it! It would have been an easy sale.
                    Last edited by David Schwab; 12-07-2009, 03:46 AM. Reason: typo
                    It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                    http://coneyislandguitars.com
                    www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hi Matt

                      You wouldn´t happen to know which direction these pups are wound by any chance, and which end of the bobbin is the start. I just had one in with the black lead out bobbin dead and would like to rewind it.

                      Cheers

                      ANDREW
                      Originally posted by belwar View Post
                      Someone walked into my shop with an old beat up Gibson Ripper bass yesterday. Probably 1970's. I now make a habit of measuring everything that comes my way. So without further ado, here are some measurements from the Gibson Ripper Pickups.

                      Bridge Pickup:

                      Resistance to DC Current:
                      Total DCR: 6.25kohms
                      First Coil DCR (Black Wire Coil): 3.138
                      Second Coil DCR (Red Wire Coil): 3.106

                      Magnets:
                      Pole Screws read north
                      Pole 1: 598 gauss
                      Pole 2: 598 gauss
                      Pole 3: 600 gauss
                      Pole 4: 600-700 Gauss
                      Outside of the pickup, on the side of the plastic case: 400-580 Gauss, south pole.

                      Inductance/Capacitance/Q/D:
                      These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "SER" setting.
                      Inductance @ 120hz: 2.400H
                      Capacitance @ 120hz: 700nf (0.7uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .293
                      Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.397
                      Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.234H
                      Capacitance @ 1000hz: 11.317nf (0.011uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.86
                      Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5499

                      These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "PAL" setting.
                      Inductance @ 120hz: 30.2H
                      Capacitance @ 120hz: No Reading
                      Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .293
                      Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.406
                      Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.88H
                      Capacitance @ 1000hz: 8.68nf (0.0086uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.848
                      Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5412

                      Resistance to AC current:
                      AC Resistance @ 120hz: 6.297KOhms
                      AC Resistance @ 1000hz: 7.474KOhms

                      Resonance Peak: 12.18 khz @ 0.76v

                      Signifigant figures were not used, these are direct readings only.


                      Neck Pickup:

                      Resistance to DC Current:
                      Total DCR: 6.35kohms
                      First Coil DCR (Black Wire Coil): 3.13
                      Second Coil DCR (Red Wire Coil): 3.215

                      Magnets:
                      Pole Screws read north
                      Pole 1: 380 gauss
                      Pole 2: 350 gauss
                      Pole 3: 311 gauss
                      Pole 4: 340 Gauss
                      Outside of the pickup, on the side of the plastic case: 275-400 Gauss, south pole.

                      Inductance/Capacitance/Q/D:
                      These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "SER" setting.
                      Inductance @ 120hz: 2.462H
                      Capacitance @ 120hz: 682.8nf (0.68uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .2958
                      Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.38
                      Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.291H
                      Capacitance @ 1000hz: 11.037nf (0.011uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.854
                      Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5478

                      These reading measured using an Extech 380193 using the "PAL" setting.
                      Inductance @ 120hz: 30.63H
                      Capacitance @ 120hz: No Reading
                      Quality (Q) @ 120hz: .2953
                      Disapation (D) @ 120hz: 3.386
                      Inductance @ 1000hz: 2.957H
                      Capacitance @ 1000hz: 8.486nf (0.008uf)
                      Quality (Q) @ 1000hz: 1.855
                      Disapation (D) @ 1000hz: .5387

                      Resistance to AC current:
                      AC Resistance @ 120hz: 6.43Kohms
                      AC Resistance @ 1000hz: 7.634

                      Resonance Peak: 12.37 khz @ 0.78v

                      Signifigant figures were not used, these are direct readings only.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by the great waldo View Post
                        Hi Matt

                        You wouldn´t happen to know which direction these pups are wound by any chance, and which end of the bobbin is the start. I just had one in with the black lead out bobbin dead and would like to rewind it.

                        Cheers

                        ANDREW
                        I'm not Matt, but the two coils should be wound the same, and then have the tops both facing the poles. If you wind it wrong compared to the other coil, don't worry, just swap the polarity. You'll know if it's wrong because it will hum.
                        It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                        http://coneyislandguitars.com
                        www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                          I'm not Matt, but the two coils should be wound the same, and then have the tops both facing the poles. If you wind it wrong compared to the other coil, don't worry, just swap the polarity. You'll know if it's wrong because it will hum.
                          Hi David

                          I was hoping that was the case, I couldnt see which way the coils were wound but measured the phase of the working coil and its the same as the one I rewound. I suppose i´ll need to let it "break in" for a while to get it to match up with the working coil.

                          Cheers

                          Andrew

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X