Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1955 P90 muddy - defect insulation?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1955 P90 muddy - defect insulation?

    I recently bought a pair of P90:ies from 1955. They both measure just above 7 Kohm. One sounds just great and the other one muddy (but nice). The muddy P90 also makes the vol pot act differently (more in steps rather than a log curve). The bobbin is intact and the magnet wire tape/paper looks untouched, the PU looks dead stock.
    When I measure resistance, the muddy P90 seems OK. When I check for a short, the multimeter does not indicate a short but ads a number on the display – like 1.958. When doing the same maneuver (checking for a short) with the stock 2007 P90:ies the display goes 1. See pic

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20121023_194337.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	2.93 MB
ID:	866839

    Does this indicate that the winding (insulation) is defect? I had a similar problem with another PU. That time the problem disappeared when I changed the wire (PU->pot).

  • #2
    If they both read similar DCR, I would check the magnet gauss between the two?
    T
    "If Hitler invaded Hell, I would make at least a favourable reference of the Devil in the House of Commons." Winston Churchill
    Terry

    Comment


    • #3
      Sounds like a short to me, especially the way it works with the volume pot.

      How are you checking for a short? With the continuity setting? That wont work for a pickup, it checks for a low resistance between the probes. You already know what the resistance is. You would need to check the AC resistance to see if there was a short.

      But the dull sound seems to indicate a short. Are the magnets similar strength on both pickups?
      It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


      http://coneyislandguitars.com
      www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
        Sounds like a short to me, especially the way it works with the volume pot.

        How are you checking for a short? With the continuity setting? That wont work for a pickup, it checks for a low resistance between the probes. You already know what the resistance is. You would need to check the AC resistance to see if there was a short.

        But the dull sound seems to indicate a short. Are the magnets similar strength on both pickups?
        Thank you for replying,
        I took it apart and desoldered the wire to the PU. Still the same reading. So it's the magnet wire. I tested three other PU:s that reads OK, like on the pic.
        How do I test AC resistance?

        Bjorn

        Comment


        • #5
          Probably insulation and/or wire corrosion. Either would kill highs. Insulation break down would increase capacitance, while wire surface corrosion would increase resistance on highs which travel closer to the surface without really changing the Rdc reading. Check the capacitance: + to - tied with the poles/chassis/ground wire. There could be micro insulation cracks that would cause eddy currents -- all kinds of cancellations. Sounds like it needs a rewind.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Fluoroscope 5000 View Post
            Probably insulation and/or wire corrosion. Either would kill highs. Insulation break down would increase capacitance, while wire surface corrosion would increase resistance on highs which travel closer to the surface without really changing the Rdc reading. Check the capacitance: + to - tied with the poles/chassis/ground wire. There could be micro insulation cracks that would cause eddy currents -- all kinds of cancellations. Sounds like it needs a rewind.
            OK. Thanks for the reply. What would a normal capacitance be?

            Bjorn

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by orangedrop View Post
              OK. Thanks for the reply. What would a normal capacitance be?
              You really can't measure the capacitance on pickups. Clearly this pickup needs to be rewound. There's no other way around it. Regardless of how it measures, it doesn't sound good.
              It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


              http://coneyislandguitars.com
              www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

              Comment


              • #8
                Before you slice the wire off the bobbin weigh it without screws, unwind to determine the turn per layer and also read the outer dimeter of the wire with a micrometer, then take 10 feet of the wire by wrapping around a one foot ruler 5 times and take an ohms reading and divide by 10 to get an ohms per foot. If you want to keep the tone as true to original as possible use the above info for the rewind.
                They don't make them like they used to... We do.
                www.throbak.com
                Vintage PAF Pickups Website

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fluoroscope 5000 View Post
                  Probably insulation and/or wire corrosion. Either would kill highs. Insulation break down would increase capacitance, while wire surface corrosion would increase resistance on highs which travel closer to the surface without really changing the Rdc reading. Check the capacitance: + to - tied with the poles/chassis/ground wire. There could be micro insulation cracks that would cause eddy currents -- all kinds of cancellations. Sounds like it needs a rewind.
                  The skin depth of copper at 10 KHz is a bit under a mm. #42 wire is something like .05 mm in dia. I do not think skin effect is an issue, period.

                  How is he going to measure the capacitance? Not going to get an accurate reading with a normal meter.

                  Micro cracks causing eddy currents? Stupidest thing I have ever heard.

                  You are offering advice on things you know nothing about. Your advice is best ignored.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                    You really can't measure the capacitance on pickups. Clearly this pickup needs to be rewound. There's no other way around it. Regardless of how it measures, it doesn't sound good.
                    True

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JGundry View Post
                      Before you slice the wire off the bobbin weigh it without screws, unwind to determine the turn per layer and also read the outer dimeter of the wire with a micrometer, then take 10 feet of the wire by wrapping around a one foot ruler 5 times and take an ohms reading and divide by 10 to get an ohms per foot. If you want to keep the tone as true to original as possible use the above info for the rewind.
                      Very good advice! Thank you

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by orangedrop View Post
                        Very good advice! Thank you
                        Let us know the info if you can. Particularly the ohms per foot and wire diameter.
                        They don't make them like they used to... We do.
                        www.throbak.com
                        Vintage PAF Pickups Website

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                          You really can't measure the capacitance on pickups. Clearly this pickup needs to be rewound. There's no other way around it. Regardless of how it measures, it doesn't sound good.

                          So you are thinking that a few turns might be shorted out? That is, not enough to change the dc resistance by a noticeable amount, but enough so that you couple in enough energy at high frequencies to increase the damping.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View Post
                            So you are thinking that a few turns might be shorted out? That is, not enough to change the dc resistance by a noticeable amount, but enough so that you couple in enough energy at high frequencies to increase the damping.
                            Yes. I've had that happen on pickups I've wound, and they are very dull sounding. They don't read all that different than they should either.
                            It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                            http://coneyislandguitars.com
                            www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Vintage bridge P-90's in particular seem to be prone to shorting out windings but still working. Gibson often put 1/16' spacers between the bridge magnets and the baseplates but still screwed the baseplate flush to the keeper bar. This mashes the magnets against the lower half of the bobbin and sometimes cracks the bottom of the basplates. Over time I think they can end up with quite a few shorted out windings when this happens. I have a P-90 here like that. The ohms per foot and wire diameter and resistance of the pickup does not match up. The bobbin weighs 3 grams more than it should and I have to believe some turns are shorted out.
                              They don't make them like they used to... We do.
                              www.throbak.com
                              Vintage PAF Pickups Website

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X