I would hazard that #42 aluminum wire will be very difficult to handle in practice, and any flux strong enough to work will eat the wire after a year, causing dead-pickup returns.
If the objective is to achieve higher resistance per length, one can achieve the same by using wire 80% the diameter, so if one goes from #42 to #44, one will achieve the same resistance per length as changing from copper to aluminum.
The #44 is smaller in diameter than #42, so the coils will be tighter, which may or may not be an advantage. Some compensation is possible: #44 single build is 0.0028" in diameter, while #44 double build is 0.0025" in diameter, the difference being lost in normal manufacturing variation.
If the objective is to achieve higher resistance per length, one can achieve the same by using wire 80% the diameter, so if one goes from #42 to #44, one will achieve the same resistance per length as changing from copper to aluminum.
The #44 is smaller in diameter than #42, so the coils will be tighter, which may or may not be an advantage. Some compensation is possible: #44 single build is 0.0028" in diameter, while #44 double build is 0.0025" in diameter, the difference being lost in normal manufacturing variation.
Comment