I've been getting frustrated with resources around the web that promise to explain the difference between AlNiCo 2, AlNiCo 3 and AlNiCo 5. They talk about how there are different balances of alloys, that some are magnetically stronger that others, then [magic goes here] and AlNiCo 2 ends up sounding softer, AlNiCo 3 has less string pull, and AlNiCo 5 is brighter and stronger... but none of them say why. I get the feeling none of them really know why since it never gets mentioned in the ten or so webpages I've looked, at and a book I've read all about pickup design. So there's sort of a black hole of information, because if you go the magnet experts, they can't tell you why AlNiCo 2 sounds different than AlNiCo 5 since they don't care about that, they care about it's industrial applications, such as heat tolerance, shock tolerance, coercivity, the ability to change polarity, form custom shapes, etc.
So why exactly does AlNiCo 2 usually sound softer than AlNiCo 5? If it's merely because it's weaker in strength, then why doesn't a degaussed AlNiCo 5 sound like an AlNiCo 2 in a given context? IME, a daguassed AlNiCo 5 actually sounds even brighter than a fully charged one, albeit weaker, but the point being, in the opposite direction of the AlNiCo 2, which confounds the notion that the difference in sound with AlNiCo 2 owes to a weaker field.
Does anyone know what specifically causes the various AlNiCo grades to perform differently, regardless of gauss?
Side question but equally important, apparently in Strat style pickup, with the AlNiCo being in the center of the coil, the magnet material has an impact on inductance since whatever is in the center of the coil will impact how the coil performs, whether it be a magnet, air, or something else, but when you swap magnetic bars on a humbucker, there's only ever steel in the coil's core, that doesn't change. Does this mean that swapping magnets on a humbucker will have no consequence on the inductance and Q factor, where as swapping magnets in Strat pickup it would?
So why exactly does AlNiCo 2 usually sound softer than AlNiCo 5? If it's merely because it's weaker in strength, then why doesn't a degaussed AlNiCo 5 sound like an AlNiCo 2 in a given context? IME, a daguassed AlNiCo 5 actually sounds even brighter than a fully charged one, albeit weaker, but the point being, in the opposite direction of the AlNiCo 2, which confounds the notion that the difference in sound with AlNiCo 2 owes to a weaker field.
Does anyone know what specifically causes the various AlNiCo grades to perform differently, regardless of gauss?
Side question but equally important, apparently in Strat style pickup, with the AlNiCo being in the center of the coil, the magnet material has an impact on inductance since whatever is in the center of the coil will impact how the coil performs, whether it be a magnet, air, or something else, but when you swap magnetic bars on a humbucker, there's only ever steel in the coil's core, that doesn't change. Does this mean that swapping magnets on a humbucker will have no consequence on the inductance and Q factor, where as swapping magnets in Strat pickup it would?
Comment