Yes, I'm the very same guy. I agree that late '60s/early '70s stock 4001 basses were (are) somewhat lacking in the pickup output department.
An early Carvin pickup? Interesting. About a decade ago I installed a rewound 1970 Rickenbacker toaster pickup on a ('60s?) large-bodied, semi-accoustic Carvin six-stringer with flatwound strings on it. The tone was simply out of this world!
Well, back to 4001 basses. I always keep the much-maligned treble-pass capacitor in, so what I do is build a ridiculously hot bridge pickup to really bring out the Rick tone in style, plus a slightly-hotter-than-stock neck pickup. My November '70 21 fret 4001 underwent that "treatment" many years back, as the stock pickups - which I have put away unmolested - were sadly lacking in balls.
Seymour was right. Some older Rick pickups leave you impressed by the design, but depressed with the function. Cheers.
An early Carvin pickup? Interesting. About a decade ago I installed a rewound 1970 Rickenbacker toaster pickup on a ('60s?) large-bodied, semi-accoustic Carvin six-stringer with flatwound strings on it. The tone was simply out of this world!
Well, back to 4001 basses. I always keep the much-maligned treble-pass capacitor in, so what I do is build a ridiculously hot bridge pickup to really bring out the Rick tone in style, plus a slightly-hotter-than-stock neck pickup. My November '70 21 fret 4001 underwent that "treatment" many years back, as the stock pickups - which I have put away unmolested - were sadly lacking in balls.
Seymour was right. Some older Rick pickups leave you impressed by the design, but depressed with the function. Cheers.
Comment