Originally posted by ubaid88
View Post
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EMG active pickups preamp circiut schematic.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View PostNo way. This is not a circuit I would use when you have both coils available separately. You can put an op amp, non-inverting, on each coil and add the outputs through resistors. If the coils are the same, you can make the amplifier inputs truly identical, adjusting the input resistance and capacitance for the sound you want. If you want to use different coils, you have the most flexibility in adjusting the input impedance and gain to get the sound and good hum cancellation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ubaid88 View PostI just need clean sound. I heard one of the Emgs it was as clean as acoustic guitar with high gain.
If you want clean wind a low impedance coil and use a preamp to boost the level up. Just wind a regular humbucker with about 1000 turns on each coil. That will be as clean as an acoustic guitar.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Kerr View PostI'm curious about how the cage is wired - is that (and any other metal) connected to a drain wire or braided shield that's sent to ground, separate from the beginning and end of the coils?
It totally enclosed the pickup.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by ubaid88 View PostSo is anyone who wants to make clone of them.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostI think every EMG made has the coils in parallel. That's one thing I don't like about the EMG-P.
I have an old Bartolini Hi-A pickup with one coil being intentionally 1K different from the other, and it's dead quiet. I had it installed in one of my '74 Ric basses, and along with total copper foil shielding of the bass, I was able to remove the string ground with no noise whatsoever.
I make some bass pickups with similarly large offsets with no hum problems.
Consider each coil as two voltage sources in series, the music source (Vm) and the hum source (Vh). The coils also differ in that they don't have the same number of turns and thus induced voltages, the ratio being called k, where k=1 if the coils are identical. All of k will be allocated to coil 2. The coils differ in that the algebraic signs of Vm and Vh are the same in coil 1, and opposite in coil 2, so:
Vc1=Vh+Vm but Vc2=k(Vh-Vm), the difference being the sign and the factor k.
A differential amplifier amplifies the difference between the two inputs, so (assuming a gain of one for now) we get
Vout= Vc1-Vc2= Vh+Vm-k(Vh-Vm)= Vh(1-k)+(1+k)Vm
If k=1, we get double the music voltage and complete cancellation of the hum voltage. But k is never exactly unity, so what is the effect of mismatch?
The cancellation ratio is (1-k)/(1+k). How large can k be to achieve 20 dB cancellation? For 20 dB, the cancellation ratio is one tenth, so 0.1=(1-k)/(1+k), and k= 0.8181, and 1-k=0.182. This means that if the coils are geometrically similar and differ in turns count by 18% or less, 20 dB or better cancellation will be achieved.
For 30 dB cancellation, 1-k= 6%.
Either way, take a look at the photo I posted of the circuit board inside the 81. That's where that schematic came from. The IC and one surface mount part is missing, but you could probably trace the circuit assuming they didn't use a double sided board. I've been meaning to do it but haven't had the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostIf you want clean wind a low impedance coil and use a preamp to boost the level up. Just wind a regular humbucker with about 1000 turns on each coil. That will be as clean as an acoustic guitar.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Gwinn View PostIn the circuit diagram, the coils are not in parallel. They are each connected to their own input of a differential amplifier, and so are electrically isolated from one another. Unlike a direct-wired electrical parallel connection, the coils do not load one another.
The EMG-P is in parallel, but not the humbuckers. But I meant to say they aren't in series as you would expect.
The usual with surface mount cards is to use two-sided boards, perhaps with components on both sides, unless the circuit is so simple that it's cheaper to implement crossovers with wire bridges and drilled holes. So, I'd photograph both sides of the circuit board, and be sure to identify one corner with a magic marker such that it's visible in both photos.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan H View PostHi David, what size wire would you use for such a pickup, would 42 work or would you recommend something larger?
I did a bunch of bass pickups using 42 and 43. Generally you want heavier wire for a low Z pickup, but 42 worked fine.
I used a simple JFET preamp.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Gwinn View Post
Perfect matching is not required to obtain adequate hum cancellation.
Yes, I agree with your numbers. Another way of saying it is that you can approach 6 db better than implied by 1-k. That is, 1-k = .1 gives 25.58 db rather than 20 db, and 1-k = .01 gives 45.98 db rather than 40 db, while k-1=.31622 gives 14.53 db rather than 10 db, but only 4.53 db better than implied by 1-k.
But how much is good enough? Do you plan for the average environment, or the really bad one that might not be too common, but is still out there?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View PostBut how much is good enough? Do you plan for the average environment, or the really bad one that might not be too common, but is still out there?
So how good is enough? Some people don't seem to mind the hum at all.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostIt's very common to mismatch PAF coils, and look at all the people who play Strats and Teles!
So how good is enough? Some people don't seem to mind the hum at all.
And look at how much effort there is to make strat pickups that sound like the original and have no hum.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View PostAnd look at how much effort there is to make strat pickups that sound like the original and have no hum.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Sulzer View PostYes, I agree with your numbers. Another way of saying it is that you can approach 6 db better than implied by 1-k. That is, 1-k = 0.1 gives 25.58 db rather than 20 db, and 1-k = 0.01 gives 45.98 db rather than 40 db, while k-1=0.31622 gives 14.53 db rather than 10 db, but only 4.53 db better than implied by 1-k.
But how much is good enough? Do you plan for the average environment, or the really bad one that might not be too common, but is still out there?
When people intentionally mismatch coils, the difference in turns count seems to be of order 10%, which would allow for very good cancellation: 20 Log10[(1-0.90)/(1+0.90)]= -25.6 dB.
This assumes that the electrostatic shielding is adequate. Perfectly matched coils are still susceptible to electrostatic pickup if not shielded.
Comment
Comment