Juan, no fair introducing facts and engineering.....those old fashion uncool notions
"Tube frequency"? Can I get a translation on that...?
It appears the OP is building exactly the opposite sort of circuit that he thinks it is, the least "tube" sounding of tube topographies, and getting rid of one of the most tube sounding elements...the transformer. A bad transformer is usually more in keeping with characteristics that are assumed to be due to tubes.
The suggestion of a low level tube distortion generating stage, followed by a solid state current booster stage is probably closer to what would match his stated goal of "tube sound" as heard without a transformer but driving a clean current booster operated well under clipping.
A cathode follower would be clean and neutral, sort of hi-fi sounding, just the opposite of an instrument amp that is needed to supply both power and gobs of distortion, even in "clean".
"Tube frequency"? Can I get a translation on that...?
It appears the OP is building exactly the opposite sort of circuit that he thinks it is, the least "tube" sounding of tube topographies, and getting rid of one of the most tube sounding elements...the transformer. A bad transformer is usually more in keeping with characteristics that are assumed to be due to tubes.
The suggestion of a low level tube distortion generating stage, followed by a solid state current booster stage is probably closer to what would match his stated goal of "tube sound" as heard without a transformer but driving a clean current booster operated well under clipping.
A cathode follower would be clean and neutral, sort of hi-fi sounding, just the opposite of an instrument amp that is needed to supply both power and gobs of distortion, even in "clean".
Comment