As Tom said, there are definite voltage limits for resistors, which can't be exceeded because a spark will arc from terminal to terminal or over the surface of the resistor, or even over the paint.
They are different to dissipation problems.
here's a Panasonic datasheet , for 0.5W and 0.25W carbon film resistors (the most popular type) which being a serious Company shows everything (good ):
http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~valvano...mresistors.pdf
where they state, among other things:
As you see, voltage may be limited by dissipation or 300/250V (0.5W/0.25W size) "maximumlimit voltage, whichever is less.
So, say, a 100 ohms resistor will be limited to the voltage which makes it dissipate rated power, but , say, a 4M7 resistor will be limited to 300 or 250V, depending on size and not dissipation.
Then why make , say, a 100k plate resistor in 1/2 , 1 or 2W if it will never dissipate the power it's rated for?
Because by being built in a "larger frame" it will also have a larger voltage rating, based exclusively on size (I guess distance between terminals is the main parameter, obviously distance is larger on a higher rated body.
FWIW I posted here the design of my cheap voltage probe attenuator , meant to see plate waveforms on a software based PC scope, I needed a 2M resistor to drop voltage to 100 or 200mV RMS which is what a PC soundcard input can handle, and I did NOT use a 2M resistor of any rating but 4 x 470k resistors in series, inside a piece of crystal PVC tube, filled with Epoxy.
Works like a charm.
Remember tube plates can have routinely 1000V peak waveforms and overdriven into speakers way over that, *easily* 1400V peaks.
No single standard resistor can handle that safely.
They are different to dissipation problems.
here's a Panasonic datasheet , for 0.5W and 0.25W carbon film resistors (the most popular type) which being a serious Company shows everything (good ):
http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~valvano...mresistors.pdf
where they state, among other things:
Carbon Film Resistors
ERDS1 (0.5 W)
ERDS2 (0.25 W)
Limiting Element Voltage
(Maximum RCWV)(1) where: RCWV: Rated Continuous Working Voltage
ERDS1 300V
ERDS2 250V
(1) Rated Voltage=Sqrt (Power Rating * Resistance Value) or Limiting Element Voltage (max. RCWV), whichever is less.
(RCWV: Rated Continuous working Voltage).
ERDS1 (0.5 W)
ERDS2 (0.25 W)
Limiting Element Voltage
(Maximum RCWV)(1) where: RCWV: Rated Continuous Working Voltage
ERDS1 300V
ERDS2 250V
(1) Rated Voltage=Sqrt (Power Rating * Resistance Value) or Limiting Element Voltage (max. RCWV), whichever is less.
(RCWV: Rated Continuous working Voltage).
So, say, a 100 ohms resistor will be limited to the voltage which makes it dissipate rated power, but , say, a 4M7 resistor will be limited to 300 or 250V, depending on size and not dissipation.
Then why make , say, a 100k plate resistor in 1/2 , 1 or 2W if it will never dissipate the power it's rated for?
Because by being built in a "larger frame" it will also have a larger voltage rating, based exclusively on size (I guess distance between terminals is the main parameter, obviously distance is larger on a higher rated body.
FWIW I posted here the design of my cheap voltage probe attenuator , meant to see plate waveforms on a software based PC scope, I needed a 2M resistor to drop voltage to 100 or 200mV RMS which is what a PC soundcard input can handle, and I did NOT use a 2M resistor of any rating but 4 x 470k resistors in series, inside a piece of crystal PVC tube, filled with Epoxy.
Works like a charm.
Remember tube plates can have routinely 1000V peak waveforms and overdriven into speakers way over that, *easily* 1400V peaks.
No single standard resistor can handle that safely.
Comment