I have put 3 photos in my album but cannot get them to apear in this reply!
one is the schematic that I have drawn out again, the others are the scope shots of the oscillator output before and after removing the two capacitors c20 and c26, the after pic has the scope on 2 v/div so the voltage has risen to around 12v and the waveform is more sine shaped than before.
Whilst removing the caps I did notice that they where both connected in reverse to both the pcb layout in the manual and the silk screen on the pcb, I am thinking that this would make no difference to a 100 kHz signal but will replace them as per the silkscreen.
I also noticed that the resistor r54 which triggers the osc unit is 1 ohm on the parts list for the pcb but the actual resistor is 47 ohm looks to be original with factory looking paint and bend on leg, I'm thinking of changing this to a small pot to see if the value is critical. Not sure if this is a typo on manual or a mistake in production.?
If somebody could move my pics here this post will make much more sense, thanks
one is the schematic that I have drawn out again, the others are the scope shots of the oscillator output before and after removing the two capacitors c20 and c26, the after pic has the scope on 2 v/div so the voltage has risen to around 12v and the waveform is more sine shaped than before.
Whilst removing the caps I did notice that they where both connected in reverse to both the pcb layout in the manual and the silk screen on the pcb, I am thinking that this would make no difference to a 100 kHz signal but will replace them as per the silkscreen.
I also noticed that the resistor r54 which triggers the osc unit is 1 ohm on the parts list for the pcb but the actual resistor is 47 ohm looks to be original with factory looking paint and bend on leg, I'm thinking of changing this to a small pot to see if the value is critical. Not sure if this is a typo on manual or a mistake in production.?
If somebody could move my pics here this post will make much more sense, thanks
Comment