Originally posted by glebert
View Post
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hot / Neutral reversed on outlet
Collapse
X
-
"Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
-
Originally posted by nickb View PostSince the shielding is for the electric field I would have thought a suitably rated low inductance capacitor no bigger than 10nf ( approx 1mA at 240V 60Hz) instead of the wire to the case would be almost as effective and would eliminate the possibility of electrocution by touching the mic case. The inductance of the leads would have to be kept as low as possible so think really short.
But do you really think a series inductance of maybe 50nH matters?- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostI like the idea with galvanic isolation of the mic case which should include the shell of the connector as well.
But do you really think a series inductance of maybe 50nH matters?
I also like the insulting coating / covering ideasExperience is something you get, just after you really needed it.
Comment
-
Sure! At 1GHz that's over 300 ohms. Think WiFi 5.4GHz, radio mics 0.8GHz, cell phones 0.8-1.8Ghz. It's dirty out there.
Mic and instrument cables act as low pass filters at high frequencies.Last edited by Helmholtz; 07-25-2019, 05:33 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostBut the inductance of the cap leads would be in series with/just add to the hundred times higher inductance of the mic cable's shield.
Mic and instrument cables act as low pass filters at high frequencies.Experience is something you get, just after you really needed it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by glebert View PostHow come nobody just throws some heat shrink or something similar on their mic bodies?Originally posted by EnzoI have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."
Comment
-
Originally posted by J M Fahey View PostYes, the foam condom is the low Tech but effective solution.
And like the thin lubricated ones, must be replaced often."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by g1 View PostThat will stop you from getting shocked when you hold the mic, but not the shock from putting your lips against a 58 ball."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck H View Post58's tend to "ping" a little at the screen ball resonance because of it's rigidity (I've noticed). Maybe a soft coating would actually help performance.
IIRC some EV mics have hard plastic screens. H'ray for EV!This isn't the future I signed up for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck H View PostMy thinking was that since "touching the mic" has been a common denominator in the problem often enough that (maybe) some clever manufacturer could have started coating the screen with insulative material or use a secondary plastic guard or some such. I hate spit guards, but I use them. I bought a big, fat bag of them after my shock and changed them every so often when they got smelly or whenever someone of questionable oral hygiene used my mic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leo_Gnardo View PostIIRC some EV mics have hard plastic screens. H'ray for EV!"Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck H View PostI have to admit that the EV mics have been a great thing for the band on a budget. Good performance and (it would seem) good design considerations. But I'm old school and this was over twenty years ago. Everybody knows how to manage the 58's and 57's. Sound guys, odd stand in players, etc. Any musician with even a little nerd trivia can reference famous recordings done with those models. So that's what I used. My singer had a top end EV mic that he was very proud of. It wasn't as durable as the SM58 (you can use those for carpentry ) but performed a bit better overall really.
First PA outfit I got going around here, the boss man came up with a dilly of a mic, a very old and rare EV ribbon which he wrecked twice by using it in a kick drum. EV made him an offer to trade for any dynamic mic they made short of an RE20, because they wanted it for their museum and couldn't bear the thought of dingbat busting it one more time - does he ever learn? NO! EV makes good stuff, not to be sneezed at.This isn't the future I signed up for.
Comment
Comment