Brill, I bet that must be a relief
Bonus points? I'm enjoying the main prize too much to fully get my head around it, but yes, it seems weird
I initially thought you meant the 12k - 0.01uF on the pull boost, which as noted rolls the top end off a bit (FYI I thought it sounded better if both those and the bright cap on the master vol were removed).
But no, it's 220k - 0.01uF from the LTP plate.
Dunno, though it reminds me of the 220k feedback resistors on the power tubes of the AB165 Bassman http://schems.com/schematicheaven.ne...b165_schem.pdf
Perhaps the local feedback it adds helps to keep things under better control when the global loop loses control on being overdriven?
That would be consistent with the blocking distortion mitigating changes that were made; it may be something that's worth another look, being as the CBS engineers seem to know what they were doing.
The master vol does seem to mute the signal when set to min, so perhaps they tried it and thought 'why not'?
Bonus points? I'm enjoying the main prize too much to fully get my head around it, but yes, it seems weird
I initially thought you meant the 12k - 0.01uF on the pull boost, which as noted rolls the top end off a bit (FYI I thought it sounded better if both those and the bright cap on the master vol were removed).
But no, it's 220k - 0.01uF from the LTP plate.
Dunno, though it reminds me of the 220k feedback resistors on the power tubes of the AB165 Bassman http://schems.com/schematicheaven.ne...b165_schem.pdf
Perhaps the local feedback it adds helps to keep things under better control when the global loop loses control on being overdriven?
That would be consistent with the blocking distortion mitigating changes that were made; it may be something that's worth another look, being as the CBS engineers seem to know what they were doing.
The master vol does seem to mute the signal when set to min, so perhaps they tried it and thought 'why not'?
Comment