Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question in regards to treble bleed resistor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Steve Conner View Post
    I've seen people replace the tone pot with a rotary switch that selected a bunch of different capacitors, or RC networks or whatever.
    I do the same with push-pull pots to lower the resonance frequency, turns a P90 in a decent Humbucker (except for the hum cancellation)

    Comment


    • #17
      There's no rule about how complex the circuit can be. You could use a 1000pf in series with a 220k, then parallel a 330pf across that 220k, then parallel that curcuit to another 220k resistor. Now you have a smaller effect from the 1000pf cap and all the effect of a 250pf (1000pf in series with a 330pf = 248pf). If that's too much 250pf you could add another, say, 100k resistor in series with the 330pf cap in the circuit. It can start getting silly, I know. But it depends on how far your willing to go. Different results CAN be had.
      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

      Comment


      • #18
        The method that Kinman puts forward seems to be to match the bleed cap to the capacitance of the cable being used (eg ~1n2F), then add a series resistor of about half the pot value (eg 130k).
        I find that a low capacitance cable (eg George L) makes this type of thing unnecessary though.
        Pete
        My band:- http://www.youtube.com/user/RedwingBand

        Comment


        • #19
          I do not agree, i use low capacitance cables (ie : Sommer Spirit, 78 pf/meter, and i measured the same) and the effect of a treble bleed is still here.
          At least with Teles, P90 and mini-humbuckers.

          Edit : i use 4 to 6 meters, so it would turn in 13 to 20 feet.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
            There's no rule about how complex the circuit can be. You could use a 1000pf in series with a 220k, then parallel a 330pf across that 220k, then parallel that curcuit to another 220k resistor. Now you have a smaller effect from the 1000pf cap and all the effect of a 250pf (1000pf in series with a 330pf = 248pf). If that's too much 250pf you could add another, say, 100k resistor in series with the 330pf cap in the circuit. It can start getting silly, I know. But it depends on how far your willing to go. Different results CAN be had.
            Thats basically the kind of thing i was thinking of. But i'm burned out for now and will try it when i feel up to more of this PITA. Next time however i'm doing the hang the wires out thing. Might rig up a 220p and the 1000p with trim pots in parallel with each and a trim in series with each ! That should end this fiasco once and for all !

            Comment


            • #21
              Well, capacitence wise that works out a little better than my George L (~390pF, 15ft).
              I've got 250k volume pots in all my guitars, except for the Les Paul, which has 300k pots on the Burstbuckers.
              I think the combination of low capacitence cable and 250k volume controls helps to keep mid setting treble loss to a acceptable level, for me at least.
              Pete
              My band:- http://www.youtube.com/user/RedwingBand

              Comment

              Working...
              X