Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What guitar cord do you use?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What guitar cord do you use?

    From your guitar to the amp, pedal board or processor. And, do you have any pedal/s in your chain that aren't true bypass. Assuming most such pedals will convert even the un-effected signal to a lower impedance and mitigate cable capacitance from the board to the amp. This detail is actual important to me. Also, if you like the ultra low capacitance cables, which one and what length do you use?

    TIA
    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

  • #2
    After much experimenting with different cable lengths/capacitances I have settled with cables having a capacitance of 1100pF. I use Strats and Les Pauls with vintage (type) PUs. And I prefer a vintage blues sound, mostly using bright sounding blackface type amps.
    I like a buffering pedal (like a Tubescreamer) or a separate buffer as first pedal. I don't like to have a true bypass pedal first, because the capacitance following the pedal will shape the PUs frequency response differently for direct and effect signals.
    - Own Opinions Only -

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Helmholtz! That's just the sort of reply I was hoping for. And I hope to get more like this as sort of short survey/consensus to get a feel for how players manage cable capacitance. Whether they're using it as part of their tone or trying to minimize it, etc.

      On another note... 1100pf seems like a lot. That's about 12 meters of standard instrument cable, right? Interestingly that's about the same capacitance being used by Glen Kuykendall to plug into his TrainWreck amps. Also using LP's and Strats.
      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

      Comment


      • #4
        Mine is 3 meters long and measures 680p. I just use guitar-cable-amp no effects.

        Comment


        • #5
          ... 1100pf seems like a lot. That's about 12 meters of standard instrument cable, right?
          Right, but in the old days players often used coiled chords...
          I could use a shorter cable and add a capacitor.
          Last edited by Helmholtz; 01-27-2019, 06:19 PM.
          - Own Opinions Only -

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Dave H View Post
            Mine is 3 meters long and measures 680p. I just use guitar-cable-amp no effects.
            You sure about that? I mean, your DMM is accurate and all? That would be about 69pf per foot. Which is awful. Is it one of those thin, black cords with the molded jack ends? Standard professional grade instrument cable is usually about 30pf per foot/98pf per meter.
            "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

            "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

            "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
            You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
              You sure about that? I mean, your DMM is accurate and all? That would be about 69pf per foot. Which is awful. Is it one of those thin, black cords with the molded jack ends? Standard professional grade instrument cable is usually about 30pf per foot/98pf per meter.
              You're right, but why care about capacitance/foot if it's the total capacitance that matters? Apart from that, some low quality cables (especially rubber or PVC insulation) exhibit low Q/ high damping values.
              - Own Opinions Only -

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
                You sure about that? I mean, your DMM is accurate and all? That would be about 69pf per foot. Which is awful.
                You're right, I lied. it's bad but not that bad. My memory let me down on two counts. Cord measures 4m not 3m and it's about 480p or 120p/m

                Comment


                • #9
                  1100pF puts the resonance of a typical ~2.5H Fender SC with 250k pots up close to the ice picky ~3kHz range. Maybe ~2,6kHz depending on the pickup capacitance. I'd go higher to ~2nF, or much lower to ~200pF and then use caps for lower range peaks. That's what I do. I use the 19pF/foot Wilde L-150 cable. It's the same Steel core cable as George L cable. Rapco 'G1' series cable is perfectly good stuff and more flexible at 25pF/foot. The Velocity value of a Cu core is lower than Steel, so phase alignment throughout the audible range isn't as good. I don't consider that a big deal, but an A/B with a Cu cable of the same Capacitance might be interesting. Last time I checked Eric Johnson still used George L in 12~15' lengths. I think his SC pickups are ~2.3H.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fluoroscope 5000 View Post
                    1100pF puts the resonance of a typical ~2.5H Fender SC with 250k pots up close to the ice picky ~3kHz range.
                    Who said 3k is ice picky range? Maybe we have different sensibilities on the matter but "I" think you gotta go higher than that before it's bothersome. Consider than most guys will just plug a strat into a Marshall with a 10' or 20' standard cable (300pf to 600pf) and just blang away. Sounds great too. But you have to consider that a strat is going to have 250k volume and tone pots. It's a pretty gentle peak form now and a slightly more subtle 5.5db rise. If you get into 500k pots the peak becomes sharper and goes up to 8db!
                    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Who said 3k is ice picky range?
                      ^^Exactly.

                      The 1.1nF cables give me the most authentic SRV and Hendrix (studio) sounds. And this includes pieces like Lenny and Riviera Paradise. But final sound depends on a lot of influences. It starts with the type of pick and individual picking technique and ends with the speakers.
                      I favor the same cables with my Les Pauls having PAF type PUs of 4H or so for Clapton, Green, Bloomfield sounds.

                      I'd love to see evidence of a "phase alignment" difference between steel core and copper cables. (I tried George L cables of different lengths and didn't like them.)
                      - Own Opinions Only -

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        3~3.5kHz is the most sensitive range for humans according to the F-M loudness curve (ISO 226: 2003 revision). That range will generally cause pain first unless you have damage in some other range. Many guitar speakers (Celestion G12M & H series, V-Type, etc) have a dip in that range making them less "metallic" sounding. Being close to cymbals in rehearsals did a number on my ears, so I can get ringing at higher frequencies. I also lost bass response in one ear for some reason. I didn't even know that was the problem until recently.

                        300~400pF is fine with AlNiCo core ~2.5H SC pickups and 250k pots. The resonance will only be 2~3dB with that C & R value anyway -- even less with a ~3.5H Tele bridge PUP, but right in the ice pick range. I wouldn't recommend 600pF there or with standard 4.5H~6H PAF's & 500k pots though. I just prefer the flatter/more-open sound with less capacitance -- mainly on the bridge pickup.
                        Last edited by Fluoroscope 5000; 01-28-2019, 12:27 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The Wilde L-150 and George L Steel core cables were actually designed for high freq digital applications, like cable TV. Steel does have a higher Velocity value than Cu, but I don't know the numbers. Bill Lawrence (Willi L Stitch) once told me it was 200k feet/second for his cables. I trust that figure because everything he claimed turned out to be correct. If I calculate correct, the phase-angle will stay constant up to ~20kHz through 10' of the L-150 cable. I guess that could be researched if you want to take the time, but I don't think phase-angle is an issue compared to capacitance for most high impedance pickup applications, so it's not worth my time. As I said, the inexpensive Rapco 'G1' series cable is probably a better stage cable.

                          I don't know the value of Radio Shack coil cable SRV favored, but it may well have been close to 1100pF. That should be great for typical PAF's. AFAIK, Hendrix used a very long ~2.4nF coil cable on stage and a short low C cable in studio. Plugging into a Germanium FF pedal with a 5~7k input impedance would substantially damp the guitar circuit resonance anyway.
                          Last edited by Fluoroscope 5000; 01-28-2019, 12:40 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I play whatever takes a bunch of abuse. Looks don't matter. As long as it's got Switchcraft ends. None of my pedals are true bypass. I play a modern (90s) American Standard Tele thru a vintage Fender amp, so I don't worry about losing any high end. I'm just not refined enough to care. Loud, crumchy, we good.

                            Justin
                            "Wow it's red! That doesn't look like the standard Marshall red. It's more like hooker lipstick/clown nose/poodle pecker red." - Chuck H. -
                            "Of course that means playing **LOUD** , best but useless solution to modern sissy snowflake players." - J.M. Fahey -
                            "All I ever managed to do with that amp was... kill small rodents within a 50 yard radius of my practice building." - Tone Meister -

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Putting a bump on this hoping for more responses. So far there's Helmholtz using a higher than usual capacitance intentionally, Flouroscope using a lower than usual capacitance intentionally, Dave using what amounts to the same capacitance as a standard 20' cord and Justin who isn't really concerned about it. Nothing approaching a consensus on the matter. I'd really like to get info from ANYONE on this. The more the merrier.
                              "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                              "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                              "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                              You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X