LOW field BH plot
With apologies for my ignorance in excel charting, here is a plot of remanent magnetism (B) vs applied field (H) for several soft magnetic materials.
For guitar pickups, we are interested in an alloy's magnetic conductivity at LOW applied fields, so the maximum permeability doesn't matter as much as the initial permeability.
The difficulty is in finding BH data for applied field H below 100 Amp-turns/meter.
Vertical axis is B (Teslas), the remanent field
Hortizonal axis is H (Amps/meter), the applied field
Simply, "H" goes in, "B" comes out.
Down in these low fields, type 400 stainlesses are only slightly worse than 1010 soft steel.
Supermalloy aka HyMu-80 is also interesting since it saturates so quickly, makes you wonder if a hybrid pole piece like M-27+Supermalloy would work with a weak magnet.
It makes me wonder if M-27 transformer steel would be any good. Can you get M27 in slugs or .062" thick blades?
With apologies for my ignorance in excel charting, here is a plot of remanent magnetism (B) vs applied field (H) for several soft magnetic materials.
For guitar pickups, we are interested in an alloy's magnetic conductivity at LOW applied fields, so the maximum permeability doesn't matter as much as the initial permeability.
The difficulty is in finding BH data for applied field H below 100 Amp-turns/meter.
Vertical axis is B (Teslas), the remanent field
Hortizonal axis is H (Amps/meter), the applied field
Simply, "H" goes in, "B" comes out.
Down in these low fields, type 400 stainlesses are only slightly worse than 1010 soft steel.
Supermalloy aka HyMu-80 is also interesting since it saturates so quickly, makes you wonder if a hybrid pole piece like M-27+Supermalloy would work with a weak magnet.
It makes me wonder if M-27 transformer steel would be any good. Can you get M27 in slugs or .062" thick blades?
Comment