Originally posted by Possum
View Post
Welcome to the Soundpage
Click on the link "Dispersion and sound"
Now this guy is very scientific, and he talked about "dielectric dispersion" ... He mentions the tube-o-lator lacquer, and how it relates to sound.
The dielectric dispersion is also the explanation for a lot of little understood sound differences at electronic parts. Especially known is this for foil condensators, where polypropylen, styroflex, mica and oil paper are said to be especially suitable regarding sound. Concerning amplifier building "sound puzzlers" report in accordance that a free wiring is more advantageous than building up circuit boards.
After attempts with different circuit board materials it was stated that teflon and ceramics as support material lead to clearly better sound result than the commonly used epoxy resin FR4. Some years ago, when many transistors can be otained in metal as well as in plastic cases, one could easily make sure the advantages of the metal type with regard to sound.
Similar is true for some operations amplifier which are offered in plastic and ceramic cases. The ceramic type sounds always better. It is still striking that even very high-class integrated operation amplifiers are outdone with regard to sound by clearly more primitive circuits with definite worse data, if the last ones are only build up in a discrete manner. The reason lies in the dispersive properties of the plasic case.
This can be easily proved by simply painting the plastic box of an operation amplifier or DA-changer with a lead pencil. Thereby the sound of the circuit is changed immediately and drastically, because the dielectric properties of the box are influenced. This changen can be easily removed with a eraser.
A professional form of this effect is the "Tube-o-Lator Lacquer" offered by Charles Altmann( http://www.altmann.haan.de/ ). This is a coating, which causes a sound "similar to a tube". Another effect is the sound influence of isolation material concerning otherwise identically built cables. Here the following hierarchy is valid: air, PTFE (Teflon), Silikon, PE, PVC in a descending sequence concerning sound.
After attempts with different circuit board materials it was stated that teflon and ceramics as support material lead to clearly better sound result than the commonly used epoxy resin FR4. Some years ago, when many transistors can be otained in metal as well as in plastic cases, one could easily make sure the advantages of the metal type with regard to sound.
Similar is true for some operations amplifier which are offered in plastic and ceramic cases. The ceramic type sounds always better. It is still striking that even very high-class integrated operation amplifiers are outdone with regard to sound by clearly more primitive circuits with definite worse data, if the last ones are only build up in a discrete manner. The reason lies in the dispersive properties of the plasic case.
This can be easily proved by simply painting the plastic box of an operation amplifier or DA-changer with a lead pencil. Thereby the sound of the circuit is changed immediately and drastically, because the dielectric properties of the box are influenced. This changen can be easily removed with a eraser.
A professional form of this effect is the "Tube-o-Lator Lacquer" offered by Charles Altmann( http://www.altmann.haan.de/ ). This is a coating, which causes a sound "similar to a tube". Another effect is the sound influence of isolation material concerning otherwise identically built cables. Here the following hierarchy is valid: air, PTFE (Teflon), Silikon, PE, PVC in a descending sequence concerning sound.
I think I'm going to try the pencil trick this weekend.
Comment