Can anyone please help me with a query on versions of the EMX512SC SMPS? While repairing one of these (H variant, for UK) I was baffled by some voltage readings with reference to calculations that I had made from some resistor values on the schematic - until I realised that the unit I am working on has two resistors that are different values to the schematic.
These are R443 & R445, in the bootstrap circuit around Q414. In the schematic (from the Service Manual) they are 15K & 10K respectively, but in the unit I am repairing they are both 33K. This is quite a significant change, so I am thinking there must be some good reason for it (perhaps reliability, or the range of the mains supply voltage properly catered for). These resistor values are not indicated on the schematic as dependent on the model variant. (So far, I haven't found any other differences.)
What I would really like to know is which are the "improved" set of values, the 33K & 33K that I have, or the 15K & 10K in the service manual schematic? (I have the one that's downloadable from here and several other places) - I don't know how to determine which is more up-to-date, the service manual or the unit I have.
I would like to know because I would want to update the unit I am working on, if the service manual resistor values are the ones that are more up-to-date - mostly just to improve the unit.
[Also, rather more academically, because I have calculated that, on the unit I have (with 33K's), then at switch-on with a 245V ac supply, until Q414 emitter voltage starts to rise (slowed by R440 and C423) there will be just over 22V from gate to emitter of Q414, but its absolute maximum Vge is 20V. I am wondering if this may damage Q414, after many switch-ons. (A possible mitigation is the slowed ramp-up, at switch-on, of the voltage that feeds Q414 gate, caused by the initial volt-drop across the main soft-start resistors. But the precise effect of that is a bit uncertain - not least when you consider the case of a switch-off and then on again after a few seconds, during which C423 might have substantially discharged but the main reservoir capacitors still hold up, which means hardly any volt-drop across the soft-start resistors when switched back on, so no - or reduced - mitigation from that.)]
Any assistance or comment very much appreciated. Many thanks.
These are R443 & R445, in the bootstrap circuit around Q414. In the schematic (from the Service Manual) they are 15K & 10K respectively, but in the unit I am repairing they are both 33K. This is quite a significant change, so I am thinking there must be some good reason for it (perhaps reliability, or the range of the mains supply voltage properly catered for). These resistor values are not indicated on the schematic as dependent on the model variant. (So far, I haven't found any other differences.)
What I would really like to know is which are the "improved" set of values, the 33K & 33K that I have, or the 15K & 10K in the service manual schematic? (I have the one that's downloadable from here and several other places) - I don't know how to determine which is more up-to-date, the service manual or the unit I have.
I would like to know because I would want to update the unit I am working on, if the service manual resistor values are the ones that are more up-to-date - mostly just to improve the unit.
[Also, rather more academically, because I have calculated that, on the unit I have (with 33K's), then at switch-on with a 245V ac supply, until Q414 emitter voltage starts to rise (slowed by R440 and C423) there will be just over 22V from gate to emitter of Q414, but its absolute maximum Vge is 20V. I am wondering if this may damage Q414, after many switch-ons. (A possible mitigation is the slowed ramp-up, at switch-on, of the voltage that feeds Q414 gate, caused by the initial volt-drop across the main soft-start resistors. But the precise effect of that is a bit uncertain - not least when you consider the case of a switch-off and then on again after a few seconds, during which C423 might have substantially discharged but the main reservoir capacitors still hold up, which means hardly any volt-drop across the soft-start resistors when switched back on, so no - or reduced - mitigation from that.)]
Any assistance or comment very much appreciated. Many thanks.
Comment